3 total
Substantial indemnity costs awarded against a vexatious litigant who commenced an action under a pseudonym.
The defendants sought costs after successfully moving to dismiss the plaintiff's action as an abuse of process.
The court had previously found that the action was commenced under a pseudonym by a declared vexatious litigant who required leave to start an action.
The court awarded substantial indemnity costs to the CBC defendants and another defendant, finding the plaintiff's conduct justified elevated costs.
The court also noted inappropriate submissions made by the plaintiff's counsel.
Libel action dismissed as abuse of process after plaintiff found to be vexatious litigant using alias.
The defendants brought a motion to dismiss a $20 million libel action, alleging the plaintiff was actually a declared vexatious litigant using an alias to circumvent a court order requiring leave to commence proceedings.
The plaintiff repeatedly failed to comply with court orders to produce government-issued identification.
The court drew an adverse inference from this failure, concluding the plaintiff was indeed the vexatious litigant using an alias.
The action was dismissed as an abuse of process and for failing to obtain the required leave.
Action dismissed as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process under Rule 2.1.01.
The plaintiff professional corporation brought an action against the Law Society of Ontario, several individuals, and a Superior Court judge, seeking damages and declarations related to a previous unsuccessful application.
The defendants requested the action be dismissed under Rule 2.1.01.
The court dismissed the action as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process, finding that the judge had absolute immunity, the plaintiff corporation had no cause of action, the issues had already been decided in the previous proceeding, and the pleadings contained inflammatory and bellicose language.
