ORB 2026

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for uttering threats and breaching probation.

The hospital and the Crown recommended continuing his detention at the Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, a position the accused ultimately conceded.

Relying on the hospital report and the uncontroverted expert testimony of Dr. Mishra, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his treatment-refractory schizophrenia, acquired brain injury, and intellectual disability.

The Board ordered the continuation of the existing detention disposition.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for various weapons offences, was conditionally discharged but subsequently readmitted to the hospital on two occasions due to substance use and psychiatric decompensation.

The Ontario Review Board convened a hearing under s. 672.81(2.1) of the Criminal Code to review the resulting restrictions of liberty.

Accepting the joint submission of the parties and the unchallenged medical evidence, the Board found that both readmissions were necessary and appropriate to manage the accused's risk to public safety.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for assault.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and an intellectual disability, had been residing in a supported group home and complying with treatment.

The hospital requested a transfer of his care to a facility closer to his family.

The Board found that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety due to his history of violence and risk of non-compliance with medication.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order with expanded travel privileges and approved the transfer of care to facilitate his transition to a new residence.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for robbery and uttering threats, brought a motion before the Ontario Review Board seeking an independent psychiatric assessment for diagnostic clarification.

Although diagnosed with schizophrenia by multiple psychiatrists, the accused disputed the diagnosis, resulting in a lack of progress toward community reintegration.

The hospital and Crown opposed the motion, arguing there was no diagnostic ambiguity or treatment impasse.

The Board granted the motion, finding that while there was no treatment impasse, an independent assessment could provide therapeutic benefit and help address the accused's stagnation in the forensic system.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault and related charges.

The hospital, supported by the Attorney General and the accused, recommended transferring the accused from a high secure program to a less restrictive facility due to his significant progress, medication compliance, and abstinence from substances.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety but agreed that he no longer requires high secure detention.

The Board ordered his transfer to the Southwest Centre for Forensic Mental Health Care with specified privileges.

The Ontario Review Board conducted a mandatory annual review of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for murder and other offences.

The accused is currently detained at a high secure forensic hospital.

Based on psychiatric evidence and the joint submission of the parties, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his history of severe violence and risk of substance relapse.

The Board ordered the continuation of the existing detention order without change.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for assault and threatening bodily harm.

The accused has diagnoses of schizophrenia and substance use disorder.

The Board accepted the joint position of the parties and the evidence of the treating psychiatrist that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to the safety of the public.

The Board ordered a continued detention disposition with privileges, noting the need to assess the accused's ability to live independently and manage his symptoms before considering a conditional discharge.

At an annual review hearing, the Ontario Review Board considered whether the accused, who was previously found unfit to stand trial on charges including assault and uttering threats, remained unfit.

The accused has diagnoses of schizophrenia, intellectual disability, and a substance-related disorder.

The Board accepted the treating psychiatrist's evidence that the accused remained unfit due to his inability to understand his legal situation or communicate with counsel.

The Board also concluded that a continued detention order with community living privileges was the necessary and appropriate disposition to manage the accused's risk to public safety, given his history of medication non-compliance and substance use.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault and other offences.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and other disorders, had a difficult year marked by violence and required ongoing seclusion.

However, his mental state had recently improved with medication optimization.

The Board accepted the uncontroverted evidence of the hospital's physician that the accused continued to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the existing detention disposition at the secure forensic hospital.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition and a review of a restriction of his liberties.

The accused, who has schizophrenia and substance use disorders, was readmitted to the hospital after his community residence became unviable following his grandmother's death.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his major mental illness, history of substance use, and risk of rapid deterioration if non-adherent to treatment.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current detention order and found the hospital's restriction of liberties to be necessary and appropriate.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault.

The Board found that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety due to his intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and history of unpredictable aggression.

While the accused is ready for community living, appropriate housing is unavailable.

The Board ordered continued detention at the high-secure forensic program but directed a prehearing conference to address the Ministry's delay in funding a specialized residential placement.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for uttering threats.

The hospital recommended continued detention with amended privileges to allow community access with approved persons.

The accused, who represented himself with the assistance of amicus curiae, argued he did not have a mental illness and requested a discharge.

The Board accepted the hospital's evidence that the accused lacked insight, remained symptomatic, and would likely decompensate without supervision.

The Board concluded the accused continued to pose a significant threat to public safety and ordered his continued detention with the requested privilege amendments.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault and weapons offences.

The accused, who has schizophrenia and an intellectual disability, remains detained at a forensic mental health centre.

The Board accepted uncontroverted psychiatric evidence that the accused remains treatment resistant and would pose a moderate to high risk to public safety without forensic supervision.

The Board concluded the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety and ordered a continued Detention Disposition with minor modifications to community access privileges.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review for an accused found unfit to stand trial on an assault charge.

The accused, who suffers from schizophrenia and experiences command hallucinations, has been detained in a high-secure forensic program and kept in seclusion due to unpredictable physical aggression.

The Board found that the accused remained unfit to stand trial and ordered his continued detention at the hospital as the necessary and appropriate disposition.

Additionally, the Board ordered an independent assessment by a criminologist to provide new perspectives on managing the accused's condition and reducing his seclusion, with an early review hearing to follow.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review for an accused previously found unfit to stand trial on assault charges.

The accused, who has schizophrenia, is detained at a secure forensic psychiatric facility.

The Board accepted uncontroverted expert evidence that the accused remains unable to understand court proceedings or instruct counsel, and therefore remains unfit to stand trial.

The Board further found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, as he would likely become non-compliant with medication and decompensate if released.

The Board ordered the continuation of his detention disposition.

The accused, a 75-year-old man with major neurocognitive disorder, was found unfit to stand trial on charges of sexual assault and failing to comply with probation.

The Ontario Review Board determined that he remained unfit to stand trial due to severe functional impairment and memory deficits.

The Board ordered a detention order, transferring the accused to an all-male forensic unit at CAMH, with privileges for community access and conditions including a substance prohibition and drug screening to manage his risk of sexually inappropriate behaviour.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault causing bodily harm.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder, resides in a high secure forensic unit and receives electroconvulsive therapy to manage aggression.

Accepting the uncontroverted evidence of the hospital's doctor, the Board found the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the existing detention disposition.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for assault with a weapon and other offences.

The accused, who has schizophrenia and an intellectual disability, had a stable year in the community with consistent medication compliance but exhibited profound negative symptoms and minimal insight into his illness.

The Board accepted the uncontroverted evidence of the hospital's representative that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, as he would likely become non-compliant with medication and decompensate without the Board's oversight.

The Board ordered that the accused's conditional discharge be maintained without changes.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review and a Restriction of Liberty (ROL) hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible.

The accused had her pass privileges drastically reduced by the hospital after a single relapse into substance use, and the hospital failed to provide a timely ROL notice.

The Board continued the Detention Order, finding the accused remained a significant threat to public safety, but strongly criticized the hospital for failing to provide timely notice and for automatically reducing privileges in a manner that ignored the accused's liberty interests.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review two restrictions of liberty imposed on the accused by the hospital: placement in locked seclusion and transfer to a Secure Forensic Unit.

The restrictions followed a code white incident where the accused became agitated, threatening, and refused medication.

The Board found that both the initial placement in seclusion and the transfer to the Secure Forensic Unit were warranted.

The Board accepted the hospital's evidence that the accused's ongoing detention in the Secure Forensic Unit remains the least onerous and least restrictive decision consistent with public safety.