Ontario Labour Relations Board

The applicant, Riverside Fabricating Limited, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicants sought a review of an employment standards officer's decision denying their claim on the basis that they were covered by a collective agreement.

The Ministry of Labour had no record of a claim for one of the applicants.

The Board held that it cannot entertain an application for review when no claim has been filed, and ordered that her application be terminated unless she provides a reason within 10 days.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and directed the parties' attention to the statutory bar for subsequent applications.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and noted the potential application of the one-year bar under section 10(3) of the Labour Relations Act for any subsequent applications.

The CAW requested to be added to the ballot for a representation vote among part-time employees.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board determined there was insufficient time to amend the ballot for the vote scheduled that day.

To ensure the vote reflected the true wishes of the employees and to avoid future litigation, the Board cancelled the scheduled vote and ordered a new vote to be held three days later.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Board dismissed the application for certification and noted the potential application of the one-year bar under section 10(3) of the Act for future applications.

The applicant union filed two applications against the responding party employer.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50 per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Board dismissed the application and directed the parties' attention to section 10(3) of the Act regarding subsequent applications.

The applicant trade union applied for certification in the construction industry.

Following a representation vote, the parties agreed to dismiss the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application on consent and ordered a one-year bar on any new application for certification by the applicant or affected employees pursuant to section 111(2)(k) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The applicants, Teamsters Local Union No. 419 and Raymond Boston, requested to withdraw their applications against Newcastle Logistics Corporation.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the applications were withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned multiple related matters, including applications and grievances involving Danny Ajemian, the IBEW, and Urban Electrical Contractors, to a date to be set by the Registrar on the agreement of the parties.

The applicant employer applied for review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $1,200 paid to the employee, $14.35 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement to settle the grievance.

The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement, that it had violated the agreement, and ordering the responding party to pay $10,000 in damages to the applicant.

The applicant filed an application against Powerlasers Ltd. and the Ministry of Labour.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the application withdrawn.

The applicant brought an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.

The dispute between the Ottawa Public Library Board and CUPE, Local 503 concerning the bargaining unit description was resolved.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board declared Local 503 to be the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of employees of the Ottawa Public Library Board, subject to specific managerial exclusions.

The scheduled hearing was cancelled.

In an application for certification, a representation vote was scheduled.

Counsel for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 353 asserted that the application was untimely and advised that an intervention would be filed.

The Board ordered the ballot box sealed until further order or agreement of the parties.

The applicant sought to appeal a decision of an employment standards officer.

The Registrar advised the applicant that the application was not properly filed and gave him 10 days to file a proper application.

The applicant failed to file a proper application within the time limits, and the application was terminated.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the Manager of Field Services to count the ballot in this matter, having regard to correspondence from the applicant's counsel and a prior Board decision.

The applicant employer sought to review an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act.

The responding employees advised the Board that they no longer wished to pursue their claim, as they had filed a grievance concerning their termination and termination pay with their union.

With the agreement of the Ministry of Labour, the Board set aside the Order to Pay and directed that the $16,255.03 held in trust be returned to the employer.

The applicant filed an application for review of an Employment Standards Officer's decision past the statutory deadline.

The applicant asserted that he did not receive the decision until months later.

The Board set the matter down for a hearing to deal with the preliminary issue of timeliness and directed the applicant to provide referenced documents.