The appellant, Nigel Jordan, appealed a three-year sentence for three breaches of a long-term supervision order.
He argued the sentence was too long, given the non-violent nature of the offences, and that the sentencing judge erred by considering a four-year sentence without allowing submissions and by overemphasizing the need for an exemplary sentence.
The Court of Appeal found no errors in the sentencing judge's decision, noting that the imposed sentence was within the Crown's proposed range and that the judge properly considered all circumstances, including aggravating factors related to the purpose of the supervision order.
The appeal was dismissed.
