The appellant appealed his convictions for break and enter, assault, and uttering threats, as well as his sentence.
He argued the trial judge erred in relying on eyewitness recognition evidence and in denying enhanced credit for strict bail conditions.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding the trial judge's identification conclusion was supported by the totality of the evidence, including threatening Facebook messages.
The sentence appeal was dismissed regarding bail credit, but allowed on consent to grant the appellant one year from release to pay an $810.93 restitution order.
