The appellant bank financed the respondents' shopping centres with security instruments including a debenture and an assignment of leases and rents.
After the loan defaulted, but before the bank enforced its security, the respondents diverted $394,100 in rental receipts to a new corporate account.
The application judge held the respondents were free to use the rents until the bank enforced its security.
The Court of Appeal reversed, finding that under the assignment of rents, the borrower's freedom from accountability ended upon default.
The court ordered judgment in favour of the bank for the diverted funds.