5 total
The court dismissed a motion for an interim distribution and a declaration against substantive consolidation as premature.
The SMA 2 Unitholders sought a declaration that substantive consolidation does not apply to Bridging SMA 2 LP and approval for a second interim distribution.
The Receiver and Unitholder Representative Counsel opposed, arguing the motion was premature as various distribution issues, including the full economic impact of consolidation, remained unresolved.
The court dismissed the motion, deferring to the Receiver's position that a determination on substantive consolidation and further distributions was premature given the incomplete factual record and outstanding distribution issues.
The court granted a motion to toll limitation periods for unitholders' claims against third-party investment advisors in a complex receivership.
The court-appointed Representative Counsel for the Bridging Unitholders brought a motion for a "Unitholder Advisor Claims Tolling Order" to suspend limitation periods for claims that approximately 26,000 unitholders might have against their investment professionals or financial institutions.
The motion sought to protect unitholders who might be unaware of the need to pursue individual claims or were awaiting clarity on recoveries from the Bridging funds.
The court granted the motion, affirming its statutory and inherent jurisdiction to issue such an order in complex receivership proceedings to prevent significant prejudice to unitholders and manage potential litigation.
Statutory rescission claims granted priority via constructive trust in receivership; unfulfilled redemption claims rank pari passu.
In the receivership of the Bridging Funds, the Receiver brought a motion to determine whether unitholders with Potential Statutory Rescission Claims (based on misrepresentations in offering memoranda) or Potential Redemption Claims (based on unfulfilled redemption requests) were entitled to priority over General Unitholder Claims.
The court held that Potential Redemption Claims were not entitled to priority because the redemption requests had not been completed prior to the receivership.
However, the court held that Potential Statutory Rescission Claims were entitled to priority, finding that the statutory right of rescission under s. 130.1(1) of the Securities Act creates a de facto priority and justifies the imposition of a constructive trust over the invested funds.
Interim distribution to unitholders approved but reduced pending determination of substantive consolidation issue.
The Receiver brought a motion for an order approving an interim cash distribution of $78 million to the two institutional unitholders in Bridging SMA 2 LP.
The court found it appropriate to make an interim distribution but reduced the amount to $46 million to account for the potential impact of substantively consolidating the various Bridging Funds, an issue that had yet to be determined.
Unopposed motion for a Claims and Unitholdings Identification Order in a receivership proceeding granted.
The Receiver brought an unopposed motion for a Claims and Unitholdings Identification Order and for approval of its activities as described in its 12th Report.
The court found the proposed order practical and reasonable to assist the Receiver with the distribution process.
The motion was granted and the Receiver's activities were approved.
