A physician brought a motion to lift a stay of a civil action alleging constructive dismissal against a hospital and department head.
The defendants argued that disputes concerning revocation or alteration of hospital privileges must be resolved through the statutory review and appeal process under the Public Hospitals Act, which provides a comprehensive code for such matters.
The court held that although the impugned “double coverage” scheduling requirement may have substantially altered the physician’s hospital privileges, the evidentiary record did not establish that the decision was made under the hospital’s bylaws as required to trigger the statutory appeal regime.
Because the hospital bylaws were not before the court, the court could not conclude that the statutory process applied.
The stay was therefore lifted and the constructive dismissal action was permitted to proceed.