The respondent pleaded guilty to multiple counts of sexual assault and uttering threats against two employees at his workplace.
The sentencing judge imposed a 16-month jail sentence but declined to make a mandatory Sex Offender Information Registration Act (SOIRA) order, finding it would be grossly disproportionate to the public interest.
The Crown appealed the refusal to impose the SOIRA order.
The Superior Court of Justice allowed the appeal, finding the sentencing judge erred in principle by reversing the statutory presumption in favour of the order and failing to properly analyze the enumerated factors under s. 490.012(4) of the Criminal Code.
A SOIRA order was imposed.