The accused faced numerous charges including weapons offences, drug trafficking, and resisting arrest after police executed a general warrant and a CDSA warrant at a hotel room.
The accused brought Charter applications challenging the validity of the general warrant and alleging violations of his section 10(b) right to counsel.
The court dismissed the Charter applications, finding the general warrant was properly issued with valid preconditions and the accused failed to establish a section 10(b) breach.
On the trial merits, the court found the Crown proved constructive possession of the drugs and loaded firearms found in the hotel room, and the accused's guilt for resisting arrest and possession of proceeds of crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
