7 total
Participant status granted to neighbours and 10-day hearing scheduled for zoning by-law amendment appeal.
The applicant appealed the City of London's refusal of a Zoning By-Law Amendment application to facilitate the development of three 14-storey apartment buildings.
At the first Case Management Conference, the Tribunal considered status requests from three neighbouring property owners.
After clarifying the roles of parties and participants, all three individuals requested and were granted participant status on consent.
The Tribunal scheduled a 10-day hearing and approved the Procedural Order.
Procedural Order approved and merit hearing scheduled for townhouse development appeals.
The Tribunal convened a Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the municipality's refusal of applications to amend the Zoning By-law and Official Plan for a proposed townhouse development.
The Tribunal approved the Procedural Order and Issues List on consent of the parties and scheduled a six-day merit hearing for October 2026.
Procedural order issued scheduling a seven-day hearing for an expropriation compensation claim.
The Ontario Land Tribunal conducted a status conference regarding a claim for compensation under the Expropriations Act.
The Tribunal issued a Procedural Order on consent of the parties, scheduling a seven-day video hearing to commence on May 19, 2026, and setting out the procedural steps and deadlines leading up to the hearing.
Appeals allowed in part; proposed parking rate of 1.19 spaces per unit approved for apartment buildings.
The applicant appealed the non-decision of its Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications to permit residential development in Ingersoll.
The parties reached a settlement on most issues, leaving only the appropriate parking rate for two proposed apartment buildings in dispute.
The Tribunal preferred the applicant's transportation expert evidence, finding that the proposed parking rate of 1.19 spaces per unit was optimal given the site's walkability and bikeability.
The appeals were allowed in part and the planning instruments were approved.
Tribunal approves settlement amending municipal development charges by-law.
The appellants appealed the Municipality of Chatham-Kent's Development Charges By-law No. 148-2022 under section 14 of the Development Charges Act, 1997.
The parties reached a settlement and presented revised development charge rates to the Tribunal.
Based on uncontested expert evidence that the revised rates conformed with the Act and did not increase the amounts payable, the Tribunal approved the settlement and ordered the by-law amended accordingly.
Appeals allowed in part to implement a settlement for a residential subdivision and zoning amendments.
The appellant appealed the failure of the municipality and county to make decisions on a Zoning By-law Amendment and a Plan of Subdivision, as well as the passage of a comprehensive Zoning By-law.
At a settlement hearing, the Tribunal considered uncontroverted expert planning evidence supporting a proposed residential development of 522-714 units.
The Tribunal found the settlement proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the applicable official plans, representing good planning and the public interest.
The appeals were allowed in part to implement the settlement.
Tribunal approves revised Procedural Order and schedules partial Settlement Hearing for appeals of Guelph's Clair-Maltby Secondary Plan.
This was the fourth Case Management Conference regarding appeals of the City of Guelph's Official Plan Amendment No. 79 (Clair-Maltby Secondary Plan).
The parties reported substantial progress in settlement discussions and requested a partial Settlement Hearing.
The Tribunal approved a revised Procedural Order and Issues List, and scheduled a partial Settlement Hearing for January 25, 2024.
