The accused, charged with drug trafficking offences, brought pre-trial motions alleging violations of their s. 8 Charter rights.
One accused challenged the warrantless obtaining of his Airbnb booking information and the subsequent warrantless entry into the unit where drugs were found.
The court held there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the booking information due to Airbnb's privacy policy, and that exigent circumstances justified both the information request and the entry to secure the drugs.
The other accused challenged a tracking warrant, arguing the Information to Obtain (ITO) was insufficient and misleading.
The court found the ITO provided ample basis for the warrant and was not misleading.
The court further held that even if there were Charter breaches, the evidence would not be excluded under s. 24(2).
The motions were dismissed.