The appellant appealed convictions for drive under suspension and drive with a licence issued in another jurisdiction while under suspension in Ontario.
The appellant raised two grounds of appeal: first, that the originating process was defective or that there was no power to amend the tickets; and second, that the verdict was unreasonable.
The court dismissed both grounds, finding that the appellant had been properly arraigned on a Part III information after attorning to jurisdiction, and that the Justice of the Peace's findings were reasonable based on the evidence.
The appellant had been previously convicted of impaired driving, failed to pay the fine, and subsequently drove while suspended, claiming he had been misled by a Ministry of Transportation counter clerk.