The applicants sought judicial review of a decision by the Director of the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) which found their complaints against a police officer unsubstantiated.
The Director had initially found evidence of misconduct and referred the matter for adjudication, but later reopened the investigation and reversed his decision after undisclosed communications with the police service.
The Divisional Court found that these undisclosed communications compromised the independence of the Director and breached procedural fairness.
The court quashed the Director's decision and remitted the matter for a fresh investigation by a different investigator.