Jason A. Rabin

The applicant sought a finding that the respondent condominium corporation failed to meet its repair obligations under the Condominium Act, acted oppressively, and sought damages.

A leak in the applicant's unit, originating from a common element mechanical room, remained unrepaired for over two years.

The court found the respondent acted unreasonably in investigating and repairing the leak, causing significant delay.

However, the court dismissed the oppression claim, finding no evidence of unfair conduct or bad faith.

Damages were awarded for the applicant's wasted expenses from being unable to reside in the unit, and full indemnity costs were granted to the applicant based on the interpretation of "costs incurred" under the Condominium Act.

The plaintiff, Igal Shapiro, claimed insurance benefits from Economical Mutual Insurance Company (his father's insurer) or compensation from the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund after being hit by an unidentified driver.

Economical and the Superintendent of Financial Services brought motions for summary judgment to dismiss the claim, arguing that the plaintiff failed to prove he was hit by an "unidentified automobile" as defined by the Insurance Act and the MVAC Act, and did not make reasonable efforts to identify the driver.

The court found that the plaintiff did not meet his burden of proving injury by an "unidentified motorist" and that the evidence presented was insufficient to raise a genuine issue for trial.

The motions for summary judgment were granted, dismissing the plaintiff's action against Economical and implicitly against the Superintendent.

The defendant brought a motion to compel the plaintiff, Zhen Ling Yan, to attend defence psychological, neurological, and physiatry assessments in a motor vehicle accident action.

The plaintiffs argued the defendant required leave under Rule 48.04(1) as the action was set down for trial.

The Master found leave was not required, distinguishing between setting an action down for trial and consenting to it being placed on a trial list under Rule 48.06(1).

The Master further found the assessments necessary for trial fairness, given the plaintiff's claims of serious injuries and expert reports.

The motion was granted, and the defendant was awarded partial indemnity costs.