The City of Mississauga appealed a Director's Order requiring it to take various actions regarding street sweepings delivered to private properties between 2004 and 2011.
The City sought a stay of the Order pending the appeal.
The Director consented to a stay of the items requiring physical investigations and remedial work, but opposed staying the items requiring the City to share information and conduct a forensic audit to identify affected properties.
Applying the RJR-MacDonald test, the Tribunal found no statutory bar to a stay and a serious issue to be tried.
However, the Tribunal held the City failed to demonstrate irreparable harm to its reputation or from potential litigation.
The Tribunal also found the balance of convenience and public interest favoured denying the stay for the disputed items to ensure affected property owners receive proper notice and information.
The stay was granted in part on consent and dismissed for the disputed items.