The moving party sought to enforce interim minutes of settlement reached to resolve an earlier injunction motion regarding access to an industrial property to remove purchased equipment.
The responding party's lawyers were removed from the record at the start of the hearing, and the responding party's principal sought an adjournment, which was denied due to prejudice to the moving party.
The court found that the responding party had repudiated the settlement without a valid basis and that failing to enforce it would create a clear injustice.
The motion to enforce the settlement was granted.
