The appellant sought to appeal an order dismissing its motion for summary judgment to the Court of Appeal, arguing that a finding of law in the motion judge's reasons regarding relief from forfeiture constituted a final order.
The Court of Appeal held that the order was interlocutory and that, following recent jurisprudence, an order must contain any finding of law intended to be final to confer jurisdiction on the court.
The court concluded the order was not final and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
