The appellant, an Indigenous individual found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD), appealed the Ontario Review Board's refusal to order a Gladue Report for his next annual review.
The Board had deemed the report premature, suggesting it would be more beneficial after further treatment stability.
The Court of Appeal found the Board's refusal unreasonable, emphasizing its duty to gather all relevant evidence, including Gladue information, for Indigenous NCR accused persons.
The court reiterated that Gladue principles apply to Board proceedings and require a distinct analytical approach.
The appeal was allowed, and the Board was ordered to ensure a Gladue Report is prepared before the appellant's next hearing.