2 total
The OMB lacks jurisdiction to cap a municipality's alternative parkland dedication rate.
On appeal from a Divisional Court decision, the Court of Appeal considered whether the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) had jurisdiction to impose a 25 percent cap on the alternative parkland dedication requirement under section 42 of the Planning Act.
The Town of Richmond Hill had adopted an Official Plan policy allowing for parkland dedication at a rate of one hectare per 300 dwelling units.
Developers challenged this policy, and the OMB imposed a 25 percent cap on the amount of land required to be conveyed.
The Divisional Court set aside the cap, finding the OMB lacked authority to impose it.
The Court of Appeal upheld this decision, holding that the legislature has given municipalities exclusive authority to determine the rate under section 42(3), subject only to the requirement that an Official Plan contain specific policies dealing with parkland provision and the use of the alternative requirement.
The OMB's role is limited to reviewing whether such policies are appropriate and accord with provincial policies, not to set or cap the rate itself.
Appeal dismissed; municipality's task-oriented procurement approach did not constitute improper contract-splitting under its bylaws.
The appellant electrical contractor appealed the dismissal of its action against the respondent regional municipality.
The appellant alleged the municipality breached its procurement bylaws by engaging in contract-splitting to award work to a competitor.
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's findings that the municipality's task-oriented approach did not violate the bylaws and that there was no evidence of unfair treatment or contract-splitting.
Furthermore, the appellant failed to prove any damages.
The appeal was dismissed.
