The appellant electrical contractor appealed the dismissal of its action against the respondent regional municipality.
The appellant alleged the municipality breached its procurement bylaws by engaging in contract-splitting to award work to a competitor.
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's findings that the municipality's task-oriented approach did not violate the bylaws and that there was no evidence of unfair treatment or contract-splitting.
Furthermore, the appellant failed to prove any damages.
The appeal was dismissed.
