The applicant employer sought to revoke a Review Officer's Order that reinstated the respondent employee and compensated her for lost wages.
The respondent alleged that her hours were reduced and her employment subsequently terminated as a reprisal for receiving pay equity downpayments, contrary to section 9(2) of the Pay Equity Act.
The Pay Equity Hearing Tribunal found that the employer failed to discharge its burden of proving that its decisions were not tainted by anti-pay equity animus, given the negative comments and actions of the Executive Director and Board President regarding pay equity.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent reinstated to her full-time position with compensation for lost wages and interest.