Insurer cannot expand arbitration scope to include issues not naturally flowing from insured's application.
The insurer sought to raise issues regarding the repayment and ongoing entitlement to weekly income benefits in an arbitration initiated by the insured.
The insured had only referred the calculation of the quantum of benefits and transportation expenses to arbitration.
The arbitrator held that the insurer could not expand the scope of the arbitration to include issues that did not naturally or consequentially flow from the specific matters referred by the insured.
The insurer's request to add these issues was dismissed.
Peter Kotsiakos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 1994 ONICDRG 66