Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the matter and amended the style of cause to reflect the correct name of the responding party.
Union application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and amended the style of cause to reflect the correct name of the responding party.
Representation vote ordered in certification application despite employer's dispute over bargaining unit composition.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent office and clerical workers of the responding party.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and that the applicant established sufficient membership support to obtain a representation vote.
The Board ordered a representation vote and directed that ballots of individuals in disputed positions be segregated.
Union certification granted following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on court injunction.
The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification regarding employees currently represented by the intervenor.
The Board found that the applicant met the statutory requirements and ordered a representation vote.
The intervenor argued that a recent Superior Court injunction against individuals formerly associated with the intervenor prevented the vote, or alternatively, that the ballot box should be sealed pending a hearing.
The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed until a hearing could be held to consider the effect of the court's order on the Board's processes.
Representation vote directed in union certification application.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.
Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support and ordered a representation vote.
The intervenor argued that a Superior Court injunction against individuals formerly associated with it prevented the vote, or alternatively, that the ballot box should be sealed pending a hearing.
The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed until a hearing could be held to consider the effect of the Court's order.
Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of employees.
Representation vote ordered for proposed bargaining unit of registered practical nurses.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of registered practical nurses employed by the responding party.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board ordered a representation vote to be held, with directions for segregating ballots of individuals in disputed positions.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union sought certification for a bargaining unit of employees at Leonard’s Building Maintenance Limited.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Representation vote ordered in certification application for sales execution specialist employees.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent a bargaining unit of full-time sales execution specialist employees of the responding party.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken and established the voting constituency, with directions for segregating ballots of individuals in disputed positions.
Reconsideration of ballot counting denied; intervenors claiming to be true employers granted limited party status.
In an application for certification, the responding party requested reconsideration of a ruling that ordered the counting of ballots from a representation vote, arguing the union improperly changed its position on challenged voters.
The Board denied the reconsideration, finding the union had not resiled from its position.
The Board also granted party status to two intervenors who claimed to be the true employers of the subject employees, limiting their participation to evidence and submissions concerning their relationship with the responding party and the employees.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application, with ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction's effect.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent office and clerical employees currently represented by the intervenor union.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had the requisite 40% membership support to order a representation vote.
The Board ordered the representation vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed until a hearing could be held to consider the effect of the Court's order.
Representation vote directed in displacement application for certification at a nursing home.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union at the responding party's nursing home.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and that it established sufficient membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees to determine whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.
Representation vote directed in displacement application for certification after union established sufficient membership support.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and determined that it had established sufficient membership support (not less than 40%) in the proposed bargaining unit.
Despite a section 8.1 notice from the responding party regarding employee numbers, the numerical difference was not significant, and the responding party agreed the ballots should be counted.
The Board directed a representation vote to be held on March 30, 2000.
Board directs representation vote in certification application for dependent contractors, deferring status and bar disputes.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent a bargaining unit of dependent contractors of the responding party.
The responding party disputed the applicant's trade union status and raised an issue regarding a potential bar from a previous unsuccessful application by another local.
The Board found that the applicant had established the requisite 40 percent membership support based on the information provided.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with any challenged ballots to be segregated, and deferred the remaining disputes to a subsequent hearing.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction's impact.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support and ordered a representation vote.
The intervenor argued that a recent Superior Court injunction against individuals associated with the applicant precluded the vote or required the ballot box to be sealed.
The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to determine the effect of the Court's order on the Board's processes.
Representation vote ordered in displacement certification application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.
The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification for a bargaining unit of full-time hospital employees currently represented by the intervenor.
The responding party disputed the employee estimate and argued for a combined full-time and part-time unit, but the Board maintained its practice of establishing a voting constituency reflective of the existing collective agreement.
Finding sufficient membership support, the Board ordered a representation vote.
However, because the intervenor filed a Superior Court injunction order against individuals formerly associated with it, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing on how the court order affects the Board's processes.
Application dismissed based on the agreement of the parties.
The applicant union filed an application against the responding party employer.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties dated February 2, 2000, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.
Representation vote directed in application for termination of bargaining rights.
The applicant applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.
The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty per cent of the employees had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.