In an application for certification, the responding party requested reconsideration of a ruling that ordered the counting of ballots from a representation vote, arguing the union improperly changed its position on challenged voters.
The Board denied the reconsideration, finding the union had not resiled from its position.
The Board also granted party status to two intervenors who claimed to be the true employers of the subject employees, limiting their participation to evidence and submissions concerning their relationship with the responding party and the employees.
