Board refused to postpone certification decision and issued certificate to applicant union following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent custodial and maintenance employees of the responding school board.
The intervenor union requested that the Board postpone its decision pending the outcome of a contempt motion in Superior Court and proceedings under the Canadian Labour Congress constitution.
The Board refused to postpone the decision, noting that a representation vote had already been held in which more than 50 percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
Under section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board is required to certify the applicant in these circumstances.
A certificate was issued to the applicant.
Board issues certification to applicant union following successful representation vote, declining intervenor's request for postponement.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at the responding party hospital.
A representation vote was held, and more than 50 percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
The intervenor union requested that the Board postpone its decision pending the disposition of a contempt motion in Superior Court and proceedings under the Canadian Labour Congress constitution.
The Board declined to postpone the decision, noting that previous panels had already rejected similar arguments and that section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 requires the Board to certify the applicant when a majority of votes are in its favour.
The Board issued a certificate to the applicant.
Union certification granted as alleged voting irregularities did not affect the overwhelming vote outcome.
The applicant union sought certification for two bargaining units at the responding party hospital.
The intervenor union raised objections regarding alleged voting irregularities, including misplaced ballots and discrepancies in ballot counts, and requested a postponement pending other legal proceedings.
The Board found that the alleged irregularities did not affect the overwhelming outcome of the representation votes in favour of the applicant.
The Board declined to postpone the decision, noting that section 10 of the Labour Relations Act requires certification when more than 50 percent of ballots are cast in favour of the applicant.
Certificates were issued to the applicant.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.
Board issues certification certificate, rejecting intervenor's request to delay pending external court and union proceedings.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees at the responding party's care centre.
The intervenor union requested a postponement of the certificate issuance pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and internal Canadian Labour Congress proceedings.
The Board declined to delay the issuance, noting that previous panels had already rejected similar arguments and that section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 mandates certification when more than 50 percent of ballots are cast in favour of the applicant.
Certification granted to applicant union after winning representation vote; intervenor's request for delay denied.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees at Hanover and District Hospital.
The intervenor union requested a postponement of the certificate issuance pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and proceedings under the Canadian Labour Congress constitution.
The Board declined to delay the issuance, noting that a representation vote had already been held where more than 50 percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
The Board found no valid reason to delay the final determination and ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Board issues certification certificate, rejecting intervenor's request to postpone pending external litigation.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent office and clerical employees at the responding party hospital.
The Board declined to postpone, noting that previous panels had already rejected similar arguments and that section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 mandates certification when more than 50 percent of ballots are cast in favour of the applicant.
As the representation vote resulted in more than 50 percent in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered a certificate to issue.
Union certification granted; Board refused to postpone issuance of certificate pending external litigation.
The applicant union applied for certification to displace the intervenor union.
Following a representation vote where more than 50 percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the intervenor requested that the Board postpone issuing a certificate pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and proceedings under the Canadian Labour Congress constitution.
The Board dismissed the request, finding no valid reason to delay the final determination and noting that section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 directs the Board to certify the applicant in these circumstances.
Board issues certification certificate, declining intervenor's request to postpone pending external proceedings.
The intervenor union requested that the Board postpone issuing a certificate pending the disposition of a contempt motion in Superior Court and proceedings under the Canadian Labour Congress constitution.
The Board declined to delay the final determination, noting that more than 50 percent of the ballots cast in the representation vote were in favour of the applicant.
The Board found no discretion under section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 to postpone the certificate and ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Applicant directed to respond to intervenor's motion to dismiss duty of fair representation complaint for delay.
The intervenor employer requested that the applicant's duty of fair representation complaint be dismissed without a hearing pursuant to Rule 46 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.
The intervenor alleged that the union had diligently represented the applicant, successfully grieving his termination and securing substantial damages at arbitration.
The Board noted that if these allegations were true, the applicant failed to make out a case of a section 74 violation.
Furthermore, the applicant had not adequately explained the excessive delay in filing the application regarding events over the past ten years.
The Board directed the applicant to respond to the intervenor's allegations and provide submissions on the delay before making a final determination on the motion to dismiss.
Applications adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Board consented to the adjournment and amended the style of cause to reflect the correct name of the responding party.
Application terminated due to applicant's failure to comply with Board direction regarding service.
The applicant filed an application against the responding party union.
The Board previously directed the applicant to notify the Board by April 25, 2000, that all material had been filed with the responding party and the employer, failing which the application would be terminated.
The applicant failed to notify the Board as directed.
Consequently, the Board terminated the application.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The parties requested to withdraw the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board upon written request.
The applicants submitted a written request to withdraw their application against the responding party union.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications for certification by the applicant for this bargaining unit.
Representation vote directed in application for certification after union demonstrated requisite 40 percent membership support.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees of the responding party at a specific location.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken and provided instructions regarding voter eligibility, disputed positions, and posting requirements.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application; request to seal ballot box denied.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had filed sufficient membership evidence to warrant a representation vote.
The intervenor requested that the vote not be held or that the ballot box be sealed due to alleged unfair labour practices and ongoing proceedings before the Canadian Labour Congress.
The Board ordered the representation vote to proceed and declined to seal the ballot box, noting that similar objections had been dismissed in related applications.
Board directs representation vote in displacement application and declines intervenor's request to seal ballot box.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support.
The Board directed a representation vote.
Relying on previous similar decisions, the Board declined to seal the ballot box and directed that the vote proceed.
Representation vote directed in displacement application; intervenor's request to seal ballot box denied.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that the requisite membership evidence was provided.
The intervenor requested that no vote be held or that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing into alleged unfair labour practices.
The Board declined to seal the ballot box, noting that similar objections had been dismissed in related applications.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support and ordered a representation vote.
The Board dismissed the intervenor's request to seal the ballot box pending a hearing into alleged unfair labour practices, noting that similar objections had been dismissed in related applications.