Application withdrawn by the applicant on agreement of the parties.
The applicant brought an application against the responding party union.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the matter was withdrawn by the applicant.
Board schedules expedited hearing to address employer's allegation of a threatened unlawful strike.
The applicant employer filed an application under section 100 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging that the responding union threatened an unlawful strike.
The employer asserted that the union conducted separate strike votes for what it claimed were multiple bargaining units, whereas the employer maintained there was only a single bargaining unit.
The Board noted that the application was currently a mere allegation and scheduled an expedited hearing to determine whether the threatened strike was unlawful and what remedy, if any, should be granted.
Board Officer appointed to assist parties in resolving bargaining rights dispute following hospital restructuring.
The applicant union filed an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997 regarding bargaining rights for employees of St. Michael's Hospital following restructuring.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a preliminary decision directing the employer to provide notice to affected bargaining agents and post the decision in the workplace.
Pursuant to section 37(3) of the Act, the Board appointed a Board Officer to meet with the parties to attempt to resolve the matters in dispute.
Application withdrawn by the union on agreement of the parties.
The applicant union, United Steelworkers of America, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer, Leroux Steel Inc. Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board permitted the withdrawal of the matter.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board granted the request and the matter was withdrawn.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at Kanata Hydro-Electric Commission.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and imposed a one-year bar on further applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent.
The applicant requested an adjournment of the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of Hakim Optical Laboratory Ltd. in the Municipality of Durham.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and based on the agreement of the parties regarding the appropriate bargaining unit, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Representation vote ordered in union certification application despite employer's section 8.1 notice disputing bargaining unit estimate.
The applicant trade union applied for certification.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant's proposed bargaining unit could be appropriate and that the numerical difference between the parties' estimates was not significant.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
A dissenting Board member argued that the vote should not take place, or the ballot box should be sealed, until the section 8.1 issues were resolved at a hearing.
Board directs representation vote but seals ballot box pending resolution of bargaining unit and intervenor disputes.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees of the responding party.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees and proposed a different bargaining unit, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
An intervenor claimed trade union status and existing bargaining rights, alleging the application was untimely.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken but ordered the ballot box sealed pending the resolution of the disputes regarding the bargaining unit description, the intervenor's status, and the timeliness of the application.
Representation vote ordered in application for certification of a proposed bargaining unit.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at the responding party's Toronto location.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the appropriate bargaining unit, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Application for review dismissed after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
The applicant sought a review of an employment standards officer's refusal to issue an Order to Pay for termination pay.
On the morning of the scheduled hearing, the applicant left a voicemail stating his key witness was unavailable and he would not attend.
The applicant failed to appear at the hearing.
The responding parties requested the application be dismissed.
The Board found there was no proper request for an adjournment and dismissed the application due to the applicant's failure to attend.
Applications adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die.
The Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matters will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Prima facie case of duty of fair representation violation established; matter directed to proceed.
The applicant filed an application alleging a violation of section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Based on the application and written submissions, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant established a prima facie case.
The Board directed the Registrar to process the matter in the normal course.
Application withdrawn on agreement of the parties.
The applicant filed an application against the responding party union.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the matter withdrawn.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees of the responding party.
Following a representation vote in which more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant brought an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Board noted that unless a party requests to proceed within that time, the matter will be deemed terminated without further notice.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed without a hearing for failing to plead a prima facie case.
The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against the responding unions, alleging she was misled about bargaining unit structure and collective agreement negotiations following a vote.
The Board dismissed the application without a hearing under Rule 46, finding the pleadings lacked sufficient detail regarding who acted improperly, what was said, and how the conduct was arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote among grocery store employees.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees at a grocery store operated by the respondent.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in favour of the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and ordered a certificate to be issued.