Storesperson classification placed in service bargaining unit; single collective agreement confirmed for paramedical unit.
The Board determined the placement of the storesperson classification in the service bargaining unit rather than the office/clerical unit, noting the significant physical component of the job duties.
The Board also clarified its previous decision regarding the paramedical bargaining unit, confirming that there will be only one collective agreement for the unit and that while the union may establish multiple locals internally, the employer is only obligated to recognize and negotiate with the single appointed bargaining agent.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed as employer fully implemented the grievance settlement.
The applicant filed a complaint alleging the union breached its duty of fair representation under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act regarding the implementation of a grievance settlement.
The applicant claimed the union failed to support him when the employer initially assigned him a mathematics course instead of a business course, and when he had concerns about his sick bank credits.
The Board dismissed the application, finding that the employer had rectified the course assignment issue immediately and had properly credited the sick days as required by the settlement.
The Board concluded the union did not act arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith.
Board issues consent declarations regarding successor employer status and bargaining rights following a sale of business.
The applicant union brought an application under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement settling all outstanding issues.
The Board issued declarations on consent, finding that a sale of business had taken place and that the Regional Municipality of Waterloo was the successor employer.
The Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit, declared the applicant as the bargaining agent, and terminated the bargaining rights of the responding union.
Complaint regarding excessive campaigning dismissed; representation vote results upheld and bargaining agents appointed.
CUPE filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging that SEIU breached a campaign protocol leading up to representation votes at the Niagara Health System.
SEIU brought a preliminary motion to dismiss the complaint without a hearing, arguing that under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997, the Board can only set aside a vote if it does not reflect the true wishes of the employees.
The Board agreed, finding that even if SEIU engaged in excessive campaigning as alleged, it would not have prevented the secret ballot vote from reflecting the employees' true wishes.
The complaint was dismissed, and the Board appointed SEIU and OPSEU as bargaining agents for their respective successful units.
Unfair labour practice complaint regarding excessive campaigning dismissed; SEIU appointed as bargaining agent following representation votes.
Following representation votes under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997, CUPE filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging that SEIU breached a campaign protocol by engaging in excessive campaigning on the day of the vote.
SEIU brought a preliminary motion to dismiss the complaint without a hearing.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the complaint, finding that even if the allegations were true, excessive campaigning does not in itself prevent voters from exercising their free choice in a secret ballot vote.
The Board appointed SEIU as the bargaining agent for the service and office/clerical bargaining units, as it had received a majority of the ballots cast.
Union's certification and unfair labour practice applications withdrawn with a one-year bar imposed.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its applications for certification and an unfair labour practice.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the withdrawal, imposed a one-year bar on any new certification application by the applicant for the same bargaining unit, and ordered the destruction of the ballots cast in the representation vote.
Request for reconsideration dismissed; alleged voting irregularities did not warrant a hearing given overwhelming vote results.
The intervenor union requested reconsideration of a Board decision issuing certificates to the applicant union following displacement applications for certification.
The intervenor argued the Board violated natural justice by refusing to hold a hearing into alleged voting irregularities and the applicant's conduct.
The Board dismissed the request, finding that the representation vote results were overwhelmingly in favour of the applicant and the intervenor's allegations, even if true, would not have changed the outcome.
The Board affirmed its discretion under section 8(8) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 to determine when a hearing is necessary.
Employer appeal dismissed; withholding wages for alleged theft without statutory exemption violates Employment Standards Act.
The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer for unpaid wages owed to the responding party employee.
The employer admitted to withholding the wages, alleging the employee had taken cash from product sales, but conceded that none of the statutory exemptions permitting set-off applied.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the appeal, finding that the employer's actions were prohibited under section 8 of the Employment Standards Act and no exemption under O. Reg. 325 applied.
Reprisal complaint dismissed as applicant's acceptance of grievance settlement constituted an election of forum.
The applicant filed a reprisal complaint under the Occupational Health and Safety Act and a duty of fair representation complaint under the Labour Relations Act against her union and employer.
During the hearing, the parties agreed that the applicant's underlying grievances had been settled.
The employer argued that the settlement resolved the reprisal complaint, while the applicant sought to proceed.
The Board held that by accepting the settlement of her grievances, the applicant made an election under section 50(2) of the OHSA, barring her from proceeding with the reprisal complaint.
The Board also exercised its discretion not to inquire further, as the factual allegations and relief sought were substantially similar to the settled grievances.
The reprisal complaint was dismissed, and the duty of fair representation complaint was withdrawn with leave.
Applications withdrawn at the request of the applicant.
The applicant requested to withdraw its applications via correspondence.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board acknowledged the request and marked the applications as withdrawn.
Applications adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The applicant requested an adjournment of the applications.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the hearing of the matters sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which they will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote in a displacement application.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the parties agreed there were no remaining issues in dispute.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Time for filing applicant's statement of material facts extended to October 10, 2000.
The applicant requested an extension of time to file a statement of material facts.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to October 10, 2000, and confirmed all other aspects of its previous decision.
Extension of time to file statement of material facts granted.
Union certified as bargaining agent after winning representation vote, despite intervenor's objection to ballot name.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
A representation vote was held, and more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
The intervenor objected to the form of the applicant's name on the ballot, but the Board found the objection would not change the result.
The Board issued a final decision without a hearing, certifying the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Union certified after winning representation vote among employees at Cornwall facility.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at the responding party's Cornwall location.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant and defined the appropriate bargaining unit.
A certificate was ordered to issue.
Unopposed application for declaration of successor union rights granted.
The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.
The application was unopposed.
The Board granted the declaration based on the materials filed.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
Following a representation vote where not more than 50 per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.
A mandatory one-year bar on subsequent certification applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit was imposed.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.
Board directs a run-off representation vote between two unions after no union secured a majority.
The applicant employer applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board following a sale of a business and intermingling of employees.
A representation vote was held between three trade unions: CUPE, OPSEU, and the Staff Association.
No union received more than 50 per cent of the ballots cast, with OPSEU receiving the fewest votes.
Pursuant to section 111(6)(b) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board directed a further representation vote and exercised its discretion to eliminate OPSEU from the ballot.
The eligible voters will choose between CUPE and the Staff Association.