Who is Michelle Flaherty?

Michelle Flaherty is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 514 decisions on record from 2008 to 2022. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Michelle Flaherty sit on?

Michelle Flaherty has sat on Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario and Grievance Settlement Board.

What areas of law does Michelle Flaherty decide?

Michelle Flaherty's most common areas include Human Rights (509 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (183 decisions), Administrative Law (150 decisions). Michelle Flaherty has handled 514 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Michelle Flaherty made?

Michelle Flaherty has 514 decisions on record from 2008 to 2022 across 2 tribunals.

Who frequently appears before Michelle Flaherty?

Representatives who frequently appear before Michelle Flaherty include Rose Marie Thomas, Cecil Norman, Gurjit Brar.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Michelle Flaherty — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Workers' Compensation

Michelle Flaherty

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

HRTO OGSB

514

cases · 15 yrs · HRTO, OGSB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 378Adjudicator· 54Vice-chair· 35Vice-présidente· 22Arbitrator· 5Vice-Chair· 5Vice Chair· 4Adjudicator· 4

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2009

Respondent given final 35 days to file a Response to human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The Tribunal notified the respondent that she had 35 days to file a Response, but no Response was filed.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent that failure to participate could lead to orders against her without further notice.

The respondent was given a final 35 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without her.

Rachel Delguidice v. Thérèse Bourdeau, 2009 HRTO 718

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2009

Human rights application allowed to proceed as related civil claim was being withdrawn.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed under s. 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing a civil claim based on the same facts had been filed.

The Tribunal found that the parties had consented to dismiss the small claims court action, meaning the applicant was no longer seeking a civil remedy.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the application and directed the matter to mediation.

Hickey v. 1437470 Ontario Limited, 2009 HRTO 722

Jeremy Hann

In Private Practice16 cases2009–2017

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2009

Application for disability discrimination dismissed; layoff was due to economic reasons, not workplace injury.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of disability, claiming his employment was terminated because he was injured and unable to work, and that the employer interfered with his WSIB claim.

The respondent maintained the layoff was strictly for economic reasons due to declining sales.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant had a disability, the respondent successfully rebutted the prima facie inference of discrimination by demonstrating the layoff was based on economic factors, seniority, and skill set.

The application was dismissed.

May v. Madawaska Doors, 2009 HRTO 720

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith for late filing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, relating to incidents that occurred between 1983 and 2001.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed for delay, as it was filed in 2008, well beyond the one-year time limit under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued the delay was justified due to a poisoned work environment and her mental health issues.

The Tribunal found the application was filed out of time and that the applicant failed to establish the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2), noting she had been capable of initiating other legal proceedings during the same period.

The application was dismissed.

Doyle v. Canarm, 2009 HRTO 674

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2009

Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine if the age discrimination application was statute-barred.

The applicant filed an application alleging age discrimination after the respondent amended its retirement benefits plan.

The respondent requested an early dismissal, arguing the application was filed outside the one-year limitation period under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal determined it was appropriate to address the limitation period as a preliminary matter and scheduled a telephone conference hearing to decide whether the application was timely or if the delay was incurred in good faith.

Paul Boyer v. Sears Canada Inc., 2009 HRTO 625

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 22, 2009

Tribunal directs parties to provide submissions on whether application is barred by concurrent civil proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination based on race, place of origin, and ethnic origin.

The respondents requested early dismissal under s. 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a civil proceeding based on the same facts had been commenced.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the parties to provide written submissions regarding the status of the civil action and whether the application is barred.

Patricia Hickey v. 1437470 Ontario Limited o/a Petro-Pass, Ali Abbas and Wijdan Karim, 2009 HRTO 481

Martine Bathurst

1 case2009–2009

Alexandre Kaufman

10 cases2009–2014

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 20, 2009

Application alleging age discrimination in pension income splitting dismissed as Code permits preferential treatment for seniors.

The applicant, who was under 65 years of age, alleged age discrimination because provincial and federal income tax legislation restricted his ability to split pension income from an RRSP annuity with his spouse, a benefit available to individuals aged 65 and older.

The respondent brought a preliminary request to dismiss the application.

The Tribunal found that section 15 of the Human Rights Code explicitly permits preferential treatment for persons aged 65 and over, which necessarily implies that those under 65 may be denied the same benefits.

The application was dismissed.

Hotte v. Ontario (Finance), 2009 HRTO 458

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 17, 2009

Tribunal refuses to defer or dismiss human rights application pending Labour Relations Board duty of fair representation complaint.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability against his former employer and union.

The respondents requested early dismissal or deferral, arguing the substance of the application was being dealt with by the Labour Relations Board in a duty of fair representation complaint against the union.

The Tribunal found that the proceedings were distinct, involving different legal frameworks and parties, and concluded that neither deferral nor dismissal was appropriate.

Laporte v. Couvent Mont-Saint-Joseph charité d’Ottawa, 2009 HRTO 419

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2009

Union granted intervenor status for preliminary hearing on whether arbitral decision dealt with discrimination application.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondents requested an early dismissal of the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that an arbitral decision had appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The union sought to intervene to address the early dismissal request and potential remedies.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status for the preliminary hearing on the early dismissal request, finding it had a direct interest in the interpretation of the collective agreement.

The Tribunal scheduled a hearing to determine whether the arbitral decision appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

Delos Santos v. Maple Lodge Farms Ltd., 2009 HRTO 150

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 4, 2009

Request to expedite human rights application denied; submissions requested on deferral to grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and age, and requested that the proceedings be expedited.

The Tribunal denied the request to expedite, finding no particular indications of urgency that would justify departing from the regular process.

The Tribunal also requested written submissions from the parties and the union on whether the application should be deferred pending the resolution of an ongoing grievance based on the same facts.

Bacas v. Agropur Division Natrel, 2009 HRTO 127

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 27, 2009

Union granted limited intervenor status; hearing scheduled to determine early dismissal based on prior settlement.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The union requested to intervene to provide facts regarding a prior grievance process, and the respondents requested an early dismissal of the application based on a settlement agreement from that grievance.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, limited to the preliminary issue of early dismissal.

The Tribunal scheduled a hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code due to the prior settlement.

Messiah v. Snap-on Tools of Canada, 2009 HRTO 95

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 27, 2009

Preliminary hearing ordered to determine if human rights application is barred by prior settlement agreement.

The respondents requested the early dismissal of an application alleging sexual harassment in employment, relying on a settlement agreement and release previously signed by the applicant.

The applicant argued she was compelled to sign the documents without counsel or sufficient time.

The Tribunal ordered a preliminary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed based on the settlement agreement, noting that section 43(2) of the Human Rights Code requires an opportunity for oral submissions before finally disposing of an application.

Sinnett v. Orlick Industries Limited, 2009 HRTO 55

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2009

Request to amend human rights application to add disability ground granted; jurisdictional objections deferred.

The applicant requested an order to amend their human rights application to include the ground of disability and incorporate additional representations.

The respondents objected, citing prejudice due to the passage of time, and raised jurisdictional and limitation period issues.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, finding no apparent prejudice at this early stage, and deferred the respondents' jurisdictional and timeliness arguments to be addressed in their formal Response.

Ritchy Dube v. John Howard Society of Canada, John Rimore, Mike Szabo and Graham Stewart, 2009 HRTO 39

Michelle Flaherty

HRTO0 cases2008–2022

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 1, 2008

Tribunal issues directions regarding applicant's request to amend human rights application before service.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of a record of offences.

Before the application was served, the applicant filed a Request for an Order during Proceedings to amend the application to add disability as a ground of discrimination and made additional representations.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to clarify the purpose of the additional representations and directed the Registrar to serve the application.

The respondents were given a deadline to respond to the request to amend.

Dube v. John Howard Society, 2008 HRTO 326

Page 26 of 26 (514 cases)

Applicant

Linda SaxonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Z.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
Raymond FontaineSelf-represented
1 appearance
John TaiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maria GarciaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Applicant self-represented

Dianne WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

Applicant Self-represented

Sandra WagmanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Ted J. KovacsCounsel
3 appearances
R. Paul MarshallCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Annie G. BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Emerson MacRaeCounsel
1 appearance
Wendy LopezCounsel
1 appearance
Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance
Céline DelormeCounsel
1 appearance
Linda PlumptonCounsel
1 appearance
Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance
David PatacairkCounsel
1 appearance
Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance
David AmyotCounsel
1 appearance
Mark E. GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
David M. McNevinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Gurjit S. BrarCounsel
1 appearance

en son propre nom

E. E.Self-represented
1 appearance

En son propre nom

El Hassan BaigaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Charlotte Monardo

Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Aleisha StevensCounsel
1 appearance

for David Mirvish

Stephen BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance
Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for IATSE Local 822, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Mathew Loeb, Blair Egglestone, IATSE 58, IATSE 129 and IATSE 461

Andrea BowkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Lawyers for Animal Welfare

Camilla LabchuckAgent
1 appearance
Neila LatchuckCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorraine Pelletier, Respondent

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd

Gita AnanadCounsel
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd.

Gita AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Secondary School Teachers/ Federation

Maurice GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan Board

Donna D’AndreaCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board

Donna M. D’AndreaCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel District School Board

Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance

for Shaw Festival Foundation and Don Finlayson

Stephanie BrownCounsel
1 appearance
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
1 appearance

for Tarion Ombudsperson Office

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Tarion Warranty Corporation

David OuterbridgeCounsel
1 appearance

for Teamsters Local Union 419

Marisa PollockUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Maurice GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Mr. KeelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Rose Marie ThomasSelf-represented
7 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
5 appearances
David IngrahamAgent
4 appearances
Zenon MacyshynSelf-represented
3 appearances
John R. EvansCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah GuydosSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sinem KetenciSelf-represented
3 appearances
Katrina MarciniakCounsel
3 appearances
Donna GrahamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Robert G. KeelCounsel
3 appearances
Michael BarkerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth HeenanAgent
2 appearances
L.D.Self-represented
2 appearances
Pranjal S. PathakSelf-represented
2 appearances
Natash ParsaudCounsel
2 appearances
John TaiteSelf-represented
2 appearances
Charlotte ValleeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Paul PenningtonSelf-represented
2 appearances
L.P.Agent
2 appearances
Dianne WalkerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Claude BrideauSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
Christopher D. PigottCounsel
1 appearance
Dominic DaoustSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tim LawsonCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinjimaCounsel
1 appearance
Anne BarotSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maxime GilbertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne LevesqueCounsel
1 appearance
L.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Maria GarciaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Syndie AprilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylvie ElliottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard LamarcheSelf-represented
1 appearance
Thierry CaillozSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Attorney General of Ontario

Judith ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 5167

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

Gail E. MisraCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Charles Pringle, Andrew Boszin, Cindy O’Reilly, Lorain Burton, Rosanne Rinella

Robert M. ChurchCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Charles Pringle, Andrew Boszin, Cindy O’Reilly, Lorraine Burton, and Rosanne Rinella

Robert M. ChurchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

David MatasCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the City of Peterborough

Alan BarberCounsel
1 appearance

for the Director, Ontario Works

Megan HowattAgent
1 appearance
Micheal DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Employer

Daniel FogelCounsel
3 appearances
Mackenzie AndersonCounsel
1 appearance
Daria VodovaCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly BrennanCounsel
1 appearance
Jamie BurnsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Sunil GurmakhCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor, Canadian Auto Workers' Union Canada

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor, Canadian Civil Liberties Association

Kukanya PillayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board

Elizabeth M. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board

Elizabeth M. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ottawa Carleton Public Employees’ Union Local 503

Lori HarremanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Domenic MarconeSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Joe NemetCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Gurjit BrarCounsel
5 appearances
Roger MillsCounsel
4 appearances
Richard CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi MartinCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel S. RevingtonCounsel
2 appearances
Rochelle FoxCounsel
2 appearances
Jamie KneenCounsel
2 appearances
Matthew HornerCounsel
2 appearances
Wendy LopezCounsel
2 appearances
Roland BeaulneAgent
2 appearances
Janet MinorCounsel
2 appearances
Richard MacklinCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher DianaCounsel
1 appearance
Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance
Jayson A. RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Asha RampersandCounsel
1 appearance
Krista MoreauCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Ted J. KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
Bob KeelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113

Carlo Di GiovaniCounsel
2 appearances
Tony JonesCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4365

Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Director, Ontario Works

Micheal DunnCounsel
1 appearance
Megan HowattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Lorraine Siu

Mario SepeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Maintenance & Construction Skilled Trades Council

Anne CummingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marco Sorrento

Jean-Claude KilleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario (Ministry of Education)

Matthew HornerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Teachers’ Federation

Murray GoldCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board

Elizabeth M. BrownCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth BrownCounsel
1 appearance
Sean M. SellsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Health System

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Stephen ShoreCounsel
3 appearances
Bushra RehmanCounsel
1 appearance
William M. LeMayCounsel
1 appearance
Martha ColangeloSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DailleboustCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
John J. BruceAgent
1 appearance
Martin DenyesCounsel
1 appearance
T. Kirk BoydCounsel
1 appearance
André R. NowakowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Terence M. HeuelCounsel
1 appearance
Robert DonatoCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
VPI BurlingtonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hannah EllingsenCounsel
1 appearance
James LeNouryCounsel
1 appearance
Tracy BergeronCounsel
1 appearance
Dennis BaileySelf-represented
1 appearance
Lynne JacobSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tony AjavonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Mississauga

Casey PicardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Daryl Cherry, Richard Hains, and William Blair

Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Enersource Hydro Mississauga Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents IATSE Local 461, Domenico Marcone, William Talbot, Margaret Molokach, Douglas Ledingham, David Edwards, and Archie MacKenzie

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Milac Holdings Limited

Tracy KayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Shaw Festival Foundation and Don Finlayson

Julie O’DonnellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents William Blair, Brian Kellar, Chrisopher Groff, and Peter Eckersall

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Peterborough

Alan BarberCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Avneet GrewalCounsel
1 appearance
Tony BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskiCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle DobranowskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Service

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Kamal BakhaziCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren TarasukCounsel
1 appearance
Risa PancerUnion representative
1 appearance
Natasha AbrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Respondents

Andrea BowkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 175

Fernando ReisAgent
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Witness Christien Crosswhite

J. Paul R. HowardCounsel
1 appearance

for Transcast Precision Inc.

Ian WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for William Talbot, Margaret Molokach, Douglas Ledingham, David Edwards, and Archie MacKenzie

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance
Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

E.E.Self-represented
2 appearances

On her own behalf

Nicole WalesSelf-represented
3 appearances
Aza HuskaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maryse PoulinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Larisa IlchenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marsha PetersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
Llewellyn CaldeiraSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Kelly Ann SinnettSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Wallace LimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Santiago QuimadoSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Sathasivam ThambipillaiSelf-represented
1 appearance
James StoyleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GilinskySelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg HessianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Aristide TsemoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Trevor HughesSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Sonny MaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul BoyerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Denis HotteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Darrell VillaSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour la requérante

Joëlle FilletSelf-represented
2 appearances
Diane BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour le requérant

Yavar HameedCounsel
2 appearances
Guy LafondSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steve RichardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Audrey BrosseauCounsel
1 appearance
François DallaireSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour le Requérant

Audrey BrosseauCounsel
1 appearance

pour les intimés

George VucicCounsel
1 appearance

pour les requérants

Yavar HameedCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance
George VucicCounsel
1 appearance
George VuiciCounsel
1 appearance
Claire VachonCounsel
1 appearance
R. Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'Intimé

George VucicCounsel
1 appearance

procureur

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance

Represenataive

Des SoyeAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Dean TopolinskiSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Edward PossilifCounsel
1 appearance

514

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

3.2

cases/mo

HRTO509(99%)

OGSB5(1%)

Decision types

motion

485

trial

Page 26 of 26 (514 cases)

Michelle Flaherty

Rachel Delguidice v. Thérèse Bourdeau, 2009 HRTO 718

Michelle Flaherty

Hickey v. 1437470 Ontario Limited, 2009 HRTO 722

Jeremy Hann

Michelle Flaherty

May v. Madawaska Doors, 2009 HRTO 720

David F. Little

Bryan D. Laushway

Michelle Flaherty

Doyle v. Canarm, 2009 HRTO 674

Michelle Flaherty

Paul Boyer v. Sears Canada Inc., 2009 HRTO 625

Michelle Flaherty

Patricia Hickey v. 1437470 Ontario Limited o/a Petro-Pass, Ali Abbas and Wijdan Karim, 2009 HRTO 481

Martine Bathurst

Alexandre Kaufman

Michelle Flaherty

Hotte v. Ontario (Finance), 2009 HRTO 458

Michelle Flaherty

Laporte v. Couvent Mont-Saint-Joseph charité d’Ottawa, 2009 HRTO 419

Michelle Flaherty

Delos Santos v. Maple Lodge Farms Ltd., 2009 HRTO 150

Michelle Flaherty

Bacas v. Agropur Division Natrel, 2009 HRTO 127

Michelle Flaherty

Messiah v. Snap-on Tools of Canada, 2009 HRTO 95

Michelle Flaherty

Sinnett v. Orlick Industries Limited, 2009 HRTO 55

Michelle Flaherty

Ritchy Dube v. John Howard Society of Canada, John Rimore, Mike Szabo and Graham Stewart, 2009 HRTO 39

Michelle Flaherty

Dube v. John Howard Society, 2008 HRTO 326

Applicant

Applicant self-represented

Applicant Self-represented

Counsel

Counsel for the Respondent

en son propre nom

En son propre nom

for Charlotte Monardo

for David Mirvish

for IATSE Local 822, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Mathew Loeb, Blair Egglestone, IATSE 58, IATSE 129 and IATSE 461

for Lawyers for Animal Welfare

for Lorraine Pelletier, Respondent

for Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd

for Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd.

for Ontario Secondary School Teachers/ Federation

for Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan Board

for Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board

for Peel District School Board

for Shaw Festival Foundation and Don Finlayson

for Tarion Ombudsperson Office

for Tarion Warranty Corporation

for Teamsters Local Union 419

for the Affected Party

for the applicant

for the Applicant

for the Applicants

for the Attorney General of Ontario

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 5167

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

for the City of Toronto, Charles Pringle, Andrew Boszin, Cindy O’Reilly, Lorain Burton, Rosanne Rinella

for the City of Toronto, Charles Pringle, Andrew Boszin, Cindy O’Reilly, Lorraine Burton, and Rosanne Rinella

for the Complainant

for The Corporation of the City of Peterborough

for the Director, Ontario Works

for the Employer

for the Intervenor

for the Intervenor, Canadian Auto Workers' Union Canada

for the Intervenor, Canadian Civil Liberties Association

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

for the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board

for the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board

for the Ottawa Carleton Public Employees’ Union Local 503

for the Personal Respondent

for the Proposed Respondent

for the Respondent

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4365