Who is Kirk Walstedt?

Kirk Walstedt is a vice chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Kirk Walstedt sit on?

Kirk Walstedt sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Kirk Walstedt decide?

Kirk Walstedt's most common areas include Administrative Law (109 decisions), Other Tribunals (108 decisions), Environmental Law (21 decisions). Kirk Walstedt has handled 111 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Kirk Walstedt made?

Kirk Walstedt has 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Kirk Walstedt?

Representatives who frequently appear before Kirk Walstedt include Henry Bos, Geoff Spurr, John Kuntze.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Kirk Walstedt — Vice Chair

Kirk Walstedt

Vice Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 2005

111

cases · 13 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Chair· 67Vice Chair· 15Vice Chair· 15Chair· 4Vice Chair· 3Chair· 2Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 20, 2007

Appeal of drainage assessment dismissed; 50/50 cost split for bridge replacement upheld as equitable.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report regarding the replacement of a bridge on a municipal drain, arguing that his 50% assessment of the $15,000 cost was excessive and should be reduced to $500.

The Tribunal accepted the engineer's evidence that a 50/50 split between the landowner and upstream lands/roads is a standard and equitable method for assessing bridge replacement costs.

The appeal was dismissed and the assessment in the engineer's report was adopted.

Henderson-Hebert Drain (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 29

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 26, 2007

Tribunal granted municipality's request to amend engineer's report to correct omission regarding road assessments.

The City of Port Colborne requested an order under section 58(4) of the Drainage Act to amend the Engineer's Report for the Henry Municipal Drain.

The original report omitted a description of how final costs for special assessments to roads were to be determined.

The Tribunal found that the City conducted a fair process and that the amendment was necessary and in the best interest of the affected property owners.

The Tribunal ordered the City to amend the by-law to implement the Addendum Report.

Henry Municipal Drain (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 27

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 8, 2007

Appeal of engineer's report dismissed; proposed dam necessary for positive watershed separation.

The appellant appealed an engineer's report under the Drainage Act, objecting to the proposed construction of a dam on his property.

The appellant argued the dam would cause flooding on the westerly portion of his land.

The respondent's expert drainage engineer testified that the dam was necessary to provide positive watershed separation and prevent water from jumping watersheds, which is required for proper assessment of drainage costs.

The Tribunal accepted the expert's evidence, finding the appellant presented no compelling evidence to refute it, and dismissed the appeal, ordering the engineer's report to be implemented as written.

3rd Concession Drain West of Little Creek (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 16, 2007

Appeals of engineer's drainage report dismissed; proposed swale and assessments confirmed.

Several residential property owners appealed an engineer's report proposing the construction of a swale and buffer strip to address flooding caused by agricultural runoff.

The appellants argued that the swale was unnecessary for their properties and that the assessments were unfair.

The Tribunal found that the flooding was primarily caused by berms constructed by the residential landowners, which prevented water from flowing to the intended sideyard swales.

The Tribunal concluded that the engineer's report provided a good solution, dismissed the appeals, and confirmed the assessments.

Ward Flannery et al. v. Township of Wilmot, 2007 ONAFRAAT 24

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 17, 2007

Appeal of drainage assessment dismissed; overflow channel deemed essential and assessments found fair and equitable.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Elliott Drain, arguing that the assessments against his property were unfair, the report was filed late, and the benefits were not commensurate with the costs.

The Tribunal found that the overflow channel was essential for high run-off events and that all landowners in the watershed would contribute water to it.

The Tribunal also found insufficient evidence to rule on the late filing of the report and noted that the appellant's alternative proposals did not address his own situation.

The appeal was dismissed.

Elliott Drain (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 21

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 16, 2007

Tribunal reinstates eight-minute on-farm function time but upholds 2.5 percent labour rate increase for milk transporters.

The Ontario Milk Transport Association appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario regarding the payment formula for milk transporters.

The appellant challenged the DFO's unilateral reduction of the on-farm function time from eight to seven minutes and sought a 3.5 percent increase to the labour rate component instead of the 2.5 percent implemented by the DFO.

The Tribunal found that the payment formula was an agreement intended to be in place for at least five years and could not be unilaterally altered without substantive data.

The Tribunal ordered the on-farm function time reinstated to eight minutes but upheld the 2.5 percent labour rate increase as fair and equitable based on industry data.

Ontario Milk Transport Association v Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2007 ONAFRAAT 20

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 5, 2007

Tribunal confirms Minutes of Settlement and approves revised engineer's report for municipal drainage works.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Forsyth Drainage Works-Garden Avenue Branches.

The parties reached Minutes of Settlement which involved revisions to the engineer's report.

The Tribunal granted an extension of time to permit a late appeal under Section 48(1) of the Drainage Act to modify the report.

The Tribunal found the Minutes of Settlement to be a satisfactory resolution and ordered that the Revised Engineer's Report replace the original report in the provisional by-law.

Forsyth Drainage Works-Garden Avenue Branches (RE), 2007 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 7, 2007

Tribunal upholds municipal drain design but adjusts certain outlet and benefit assessments.

Several landowners appealed the assessments and design of the Cedar Bank Municipal Drain 2006.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding the design of the drainage project, finding the engineer's recommended alternative to be the most cost-effective solution for stabilizing the gully and road.

The Tribunal also dismissed appeals seeking reductions in benefit assessments for properties relying on the roads for access, as well as a vacant lot.

However, the Tribunal granted appeals to reduce the outlet assessments on two agricultural properties and increased the benefit assessment on one property whose existing culvert would be maintained by the project.

Cedar Bank Municipal Drain (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 28, 2007

Crop insurance appeal allowed; Agricorp ordered to pay claim for soybean yield loss due to excessive rain.

The appellant appealed Agricorp's decision to deny his claim for yield losses on his 2006 soybean crop.

Agricorp denied the claim on the basis that the appellant failed to report damage during the growing season and that the low yield was inconsistent with other growers in the area.

The Tribunal found that the crop was damaged by excessive rainfall, an insured peril, and that the appellant's reporting process was consistent with previous years where claims were paid.

The Tribunal accepted the appellant's estoppel argument and ordered Agricorp to pay the claim based on the reported yield.

Kosycki v. Agricorp, 2007 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 28, 2007

Crop insurance appeal granted; Agricorp ordered to pay claim for soybean yield losses due to excessive rain.

The appellant appealed Agricorp's denial of his crop insurance claim for yield losses on his 2006 soybean crop.

Agricorp had denied the claim on the basis of low yield relative to neighbours, failure to report damage during the growing season, and a high proportion of reseeds in the area.

The Tribunal found the appellant's evidence credible and concluded that the crop was damaged by excessive rainfall, an insured peril.

The Tribunal also accepted the appellant's estoppel argument, noting that Agricorp had paid claims in previous years following the same reporting process.

The appeal was granted and Agricorp was ordered to pay the claim based on the reported yield.

Koszycki v. Agricorp, 2007 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 14, 2007

Crop insurance appeal dismissed; insured grower bears the onus of verifying reported acreage.

The appellant, a farming corporation, appealed a decision by Agricorp regarding the adjustment of a crop insurance claim for lima beans damaged by excessive rain.

The appellant argued that the claim should be based on 195 acres rather than 305 acres, claiming the processor erroneously reported the acreage of two separate but related farming entities under the appellant's single contract.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the onus is on the insured grower to verify the accuracy of the reported acreage, and the appellant failed to correct the error before the loss occurred.

Wm. F. Bradish & Sons Ltd. v. Agricorp, 2007 ONAFRAAT 15

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 1, 2007

Extension of time granted to appeal drainage construction quality due to ongoing resolution attempts.

The applicants requested an extension of time to appeal the quality of construction of a drainage work under section 64 of the Drainage Act.

They alleged property damage and loss of revenue resulting from drain cleaning contracted by the municipality.

The Tribunal found that the applicants had made ongoing attempts to resolve the issue with the municipality and were unaware of the appeal process.

The Tribunal granted the extension of time to file the appeal.

Branconnier Drain – Request for Extension, 2007 ONAFRAAT 13

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 17, 2007

Extension of time to appeal drainage report denied as municipality met all notice requirements.

The applicants sought an extension of time to appeal an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision regarding a municipal drain.

They filed their appeal 17 days late, claiming they were unaware of the deadline.

The Tribunal found that the municipality had met all legislative notice requirements, including mailing notices to households, advertising in the newspaper, and clearly stating the 40-day appeal period.

The request for an extension of time was denied.

Reid Harper and Mary Lou Schwartzentruber v. Township of East Zorra-Tavistock, 2007 ONAFRAAT 12

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 11, 2007

Extension of time to appeal drainage assessment granted due to death in the applicant's family.

The applicant requested an extension of time to appeal an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision regarding the Burns Drain.

The applicant missed the 21-day deadline by seven days due to a death in the family.

Despite opposition from another landowner, the Tribunal granted the extension, finding that the death of a family member was a traumatic event that justified the delay under section 100 of the Drainage Act.

Elaine Heyink v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2007 ONAFRAAT 11

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 8, 2007

Drainage Act appeals dismissed; engineer's assessments and proposed routing found fair and reasonable.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision and the engineer's report regarding the Daniel McArthur Drain - East.

They argued that their property was assessed the largest portion of the cost despite not being eligible for agricultural grants, and objected to the proposed routing and the allowance for woodlot damage.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding the assessments for outlet and benefit to be fair and just, the proposed route to be the most economical, and the allowance for woodlot damage to be adequate given the lack of contrary evidence.

McArthur Drain (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 8

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 2, 2007

Drainage assessment reduced where engineer failed to fully account for existing private drain efficiency.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding assessments against his property for a municipal drain.

The appellant argued that the benefit assessment was unfair because his property was already adequately drained by a private system, and the proposed works primarily benefited upstream properties that discharged water onto his land.

The Tribunal found that the engineer did not fully consider the efficiency of the appellant's existing private drain and that the road and upstream lands contributed significantly to the water volume.

The Tribunal ordered a reduction in the benefit assessment on the appellant's property and corresponding increases to the outlet assessments of the road and upstream properties.

Wallace Concession 4 Municipal Drain (Re), 2007 ONAFRAAT 4

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 22, 2006

Appeal of engineer's report for municipal drain dismissed; proposed route and assessments upheld.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the Krueger Drain under the Drainage Act, challenging the proposed route, design, allowances, and assessments.

The appellant argued for an alternative east-west drainage route and disputed the compensation for land and trees.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the engineer's report to be logical, well-reasoned, and fair.

The Tribunal accepted the engineer's proposed north-south route and found no professional evidence to support the appellant's preferred alternative.

Krueger Drain (RE), 2006 ONAFRAAT 44

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 31, 2006

Drainage assessment appeal dismissed; property contributed water to culvert and waiving small assessments is discretionary.

The appellants appealed their assessment for the replacement of an agricultural access culvert over the Deslippe Drain under section 54 of the Drainage Act.

They argued their property was too far from the culvert to benefit and requested that the municipality pay the assessment since it was under $50.

The Tribunal found the engineer's assessment fair and equitable, noting the appellants' property contributed water to the culvert.

The Tribunal also held that waiving assessments under $50 is at the municipality's discretion.

The appeal was dismissed.

Boyce v. Town of Amherstburg, 2006 ONAFRAAT 41

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 30, 2006

Tribunal reduced allowance for existing drain and ordered it paid to current landowner.

The appellant appealed an Engineer's report and a decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Elliot Drain under the Drainage Act.

The appellant argued that the allowance for incorporating an existing tile drain was incorrectly split between him and his brother, and that he should receive the full allowance as the current owner of the land where the drain is located.

The Tribunal agreed that the allowance under section 31 of the Act must be assigned to the current owner of the property, not the descendant of a previous owner.

The Tribunal also found the allowance excessive and reduced it from $2,000 to $1,000.

The cost estimate and schedule of assessments were revised accordingly.

Elliot Drain – Branches H and I (Re), 2006 ONAFRAAT 32

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 2, 2006

Tribunal confirms 100% cancellation of tobacco quota for illegal sales, finding no mitigating factors.

The Court of Appeal remitted the issue of penalty back to the Tribunal for reconsideration regarding the appellants' illegal sales of tobacco.

The appellants argued the penalty of cancelling 100% of their basic production quota was disproportionate compared to other cases.

The Tribunal found no mitigating factors and held that the illegal sale of tobacco strikes at the heart of the regulated system.

The Tribunal confirmed the cancellation of all basic production quota but clarified the appellants could apply to purchase quota in the future.

Stetler and 934671 Ontario Limited v Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board, 2006 ONAFRAAT 26

Page 5 of 6 (111 cases)

appellant

Henry BosSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Alan CunningtonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Carolyn BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
David BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Diana HammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Finlay McCormickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
George VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gladys DufourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helmut FunkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeanette JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PetropoulosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph PruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith EmmettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ludmila DejmekSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ronald PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn ParkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Kenneth PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marian EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and assessed landowner

Jackie OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis VargaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea ClemencioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Clifford TattersallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant, and assessed landowner

Robert GregsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant/Landowner

Georges BicrelSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants

Moira DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andy HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellants

Rainer PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lynne PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance

applicant

John VieraitisSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Tony RitolaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
William TiessenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andre CartierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claire GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cliff IvensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earl HardingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edwin ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Garry SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry KellerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hugh WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jan Van NulandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lew AcreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liz BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maggie WahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed landowner

Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter SemowoniukSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed Landowner

Karen WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, appellant

Paul BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Barbara BalogSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assistant to counsel for Appellant

Curtis CleeverCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the Municipality of North Perth

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
3 appearances

counsel for the Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Cheryl BiehlerCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp

Karin RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp, the respondent

Rebecca GivenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mike Koczycki appellant

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Julian FalconerCounsel
2 appearances
Sunil MathaiCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario, respondent

Geoffrey SpurCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Ontario Milk Transport Association, appellant

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Township of Perth South

Gerry CullitonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Clerk

Dianne WilsonAgent
1 appearance

Director, Drainage Division for the municipality

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for the Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
Elizabeth JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Harold HallAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Township of Southwold, assessed landowner

Brent ClutterbuckAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Corporation of the County of Essex, appellant

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the municipality

Tim OliverAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Report

Bill DietrichAgent
1 appearance

Engineer on behalf of the Municipality

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

Engineer, on behalf of the Municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Jeff DicksonAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Mike P. DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

John KuntzeAgent
3 appearances
J.R. (Jeff) DicksonAgent
2 appearances
Gerard RoodAgent
2 appearances
John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Paul SmeltzerAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance
Raymond DobbinAgent
1 appearance
R.O. (Ray) DobbinAgent
1 appearance
John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for all of the appellants

Timothy FlanneryCounsel
1 appearance

for Amico Properties Inc.

Cindy PrinceAgent
1 appearance

for Brian Whelan

Larry PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Brunato Farms Limited, Assessed Landowner

James CookCounsel
1 appearance

for CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Janet CioruchAgent
1 appearance

for CLPA Inc., assessed landowner

Barbara RozakAgent
1 appearance
Tony RozakAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance
Frank DevetAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers (Conestoga 3P)

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance

for Daniel Neufeld, assessed landowner

William NeufeldAgent
2 appearances

for De Wetering Hill Farms

Teresa De WeteringAgent
2 appearances

for Districts 10, 11 and 12 Pork Producers

Bruce HudsonAgent
1 appearance
Rob de WoldeAgent
1 appearance

for Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

for Grant and Sharon Wolfe and Jim Wolfe, Assessed Landowners

M. Paul DownsCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Elaine HeyinkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and Eckro Precision

Terry EckertSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Bud KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Clare HartleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jay MaxnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CampbellSelf-represented
1 appearance
William YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Huron County Pork Producers' Association

Grant LoveAgent
2 appearances
John Vander BurgtAgent
2 appearances

for intervenor, the Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Herman TurkstraCounsel
1 appearance

for John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth and Lynda Anderson

Dennis H. AsherCounsel
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods (Maple Leaf)

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Mitri

G. MeakingsCounsel
1 appearance

for Mr. Schives, the petitioner

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board

Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Kim MullinCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board (Ontario Pork)

Maryann HendrikxAgent
1 appearance
Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Patricia Larkin, assessed landowner

Joseph LarkinAgent
1 appearance

for Pyramid Farms, assessed landowner

Dean TiessenAgent
1 appearance
William TiessenAgent
1 appearance

for Quality Meat Packers

Dan CohoeAgent
2 appearances
Jim GracieAgent
1 appearance

for Rein Minnema

Elbert van DonkersgoedAgent
2 appearances

for respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

Graham LloydCounsel
2 appearances

for Sure Fresh Foods Inc.

Andrew HealCounsel
1 appearance
Hank Van VoorstAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms

James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms (Synergy et al.)

Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
2 appearances
Carina BruggemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris MastersonAgent
1 appearance
Damon SrokoszSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
Jim MastersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CoxonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Matthew DickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael AllemanoCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Rick GrimaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sher HelmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom BradishSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry CardCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne HartungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Donald MurneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary ArtsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Max IlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael LabaCounsel
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance
Wilhelm GreisbachSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Frank Pohorly

Steven PohorlyAgent
1 appearance
Susan PohorlyAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellant, Gubbels Farms Ltd.

Jim CaskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Paul and Nancy Brown

John WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ruedel Farms Inc.

John TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Cheryl LenehanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Jeannine MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard MetcalfeAgent
1 appearance
Terry MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Wyatt Stetler and 934671 Ontario Limited

Burton TaitCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Alvaro VenturelliUnion representative
1 appearance
Ann SlaterUnion representative
1 appearance
Don MillsUnion representative
1 appearance
John SutherlandUnion representative
1 appearance
Peter DowlingUnion representative
1 appearance

for the CFFO

Lorne SmallAgent
2 appearances
Henry StevensAgent
1 appearance
John ClementAgent
1 appearance
Gerald PoechmanAgent
1 appearance
Nathan StevensAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne, respondent

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the County of Elgin, the appellant

Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance

for the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Alex HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Ross CrawfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Kristopher Crawford-DickinsonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Municipality

Janet McGuigan-KellyCounsel
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ruth OrtonCounsel
1 appearance
Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance
Steven ShoemakerCounsel
1 appearance
Wray RamsayAgent
1 appearance
Gerry LeggAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Bayham

Bill KniftonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of North Perth

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre, respondent

David A. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the NFU-O

Don MillsAgent
1 appearance
Alvaro VenturelliAgent
1 appearance
Ann SlaterAgent
1 appearance
John SutherlandAgent
1 appearance
Michael SchmidtAgent
1 appearance
Peter DowlingAgent
1 appearance
Rae MacIntyreAgent
1 appearance
Sean McGivernAgent
1 appearance
Steve DickAgent
1 appearance

for the OFA

Lori PerkesAgent
3 appearances
Neil CurrieAgent
3 appearances
Jason BentAgent
1 appearance
Mark WalesAgent
1 appearance

for The Open Marketing Group

Brian SimpsonAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent

Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Rebecca GivensCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John BarkovicAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, OFCTGMB

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Ontario Processing Vegetable Growers

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board

Barry H. BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Amherstburg

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Turkey Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town

David H. GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Amherstburg

Eric ChamberlainAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Fort Erie

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Middlesex Centre, respondent

Andrew WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the upstream agricultural appellants

Janet McGuigan KellyCounsel
1 appearance

for Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

for Wilhemina Van Raay, assessed landowner

Bert Van RaayAgent
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc.

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc. (Zantingh)

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

landowner

Doug JohnstonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Thomas GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for the Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Diana Hamm

Victor HammAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Municipality

Colin G. TriversAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality of West Perth

Mike KraemerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Lakeshore, respondent

Edward DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Phair Systems Ltd., respondent

Bill PhairAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

Ben Van DiepenbeekAgent
1 appearance

representative for Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Karin Gagne, appellant

Daniel DevereuxAgent
1 appearance
Ed DykstraAgent
1 appearance

representative for the respondent

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Arturo AgueroAgent
1 appearance

representative of Leanne Landers and Stephen Herman, appellants

Barbara HermanAgent
1 appearance

representative of the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
3 appearances

representative of upstream agricultural owners

John McGuiganAgent
1 appearance

representing appellant Percy and Gladys Dufour

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner S. Proctor

John ProctorAgent
1 appearance

representing Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

representing George Vanderbeke, assessed landowner

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

representing Marion Piggott

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

representing Percy Steele, assessed landowner

Jack SteeleAgent
1 appearance

representing Shevaun Day, an appellant

Steve VoisinAgent
1 appearance

representing the appellants

Roderick McCormickAgent
1 appearance

representing the City of Kawartha Lakes

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing the municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

Secretary/Treasurer of 517749 Ontario Ltd on behalf of Mr. Mario Valletta, assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Lucy VallettaAgent
1 appearance

the appellant

Jeff CridlandSelf-represented
1 appearance

the Engineer who prepared the Report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

111

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.7

cases/mo

OAFRAAT111(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 5 of 6 (111 cases)