Who is Kirk Walstedt?

Kirk Walstedt is a vice chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Kirk Walstedt sit on?

Kirk Walstedt sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Kirk Walstedt decide?

Kirk Walstedt's most common areas include Administrative Law (109 decisions), Other Tribunals (108 decisions), Environmental Law (21 decisions). Kirk Walstedt has handled 111 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Kirk Walstedt made?

Kirk Walstedt has 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Kirk Walstedt?

Representatives who frequently appear before Kirk Walstedt include Henry Bos, Geoff Spurr, John Kuntze.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Kirk Walstedt — Vice Chair

Kirk Walstedt

Vice Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 2005

111

cases · 13 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Chair· 67Vice Chair· 15Vice Chair· 15Chair· 4Vice Chair· 3Chair· 2Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 14, 2009

Tribunal orders de novo hearing for appeals of Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission decision.

The Tribunal held a pre-hearing conference to determine the procedure for appeals of a decision by the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission regarding the Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board.

The Tribunal ordered a de novo hearing, noting its statutory authority under the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Act to substitute its opinion for that of the Commission.

The Tribunal set a schedule for parties to submit proposed issues and scheduled a hearing date to determine standing, issues, and procedural matters.

Rein Minnema v. Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission, 2009 ONAFRAAT 13

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 10, 2009

Appeal of non-grade A milk penalty denied; producer responsible for compliance after report left on-site.

The appellant, a dairy farm manager, appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) to uphold a non-grade A penalty of $650.66.

The penalty was assessed after a follow-up inspection revealed that requirements for Grade A status had not been met.

The appellant argued he did not receive the initial inspection report.

The Tribunal found that the DFO followed its established policy of leaving the report in the milk house, and that it was the appellant's responsibility to ensure compliance.

The appeal was denied and the penalty upheld.

Jeff Cridland v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2009 ONAFRAAT 11

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 23, 2009

Appeal of provincial board decision dismissed as an impermissible collateral attack on a federal levy assessment.

Sure Fresh Foods Inc. appealed a decision of the Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) refusing to review and adjust a levy imposed by the Chicken Farmers of Canada (CFC) for failing to meet market development commitments.

The CFO raised preliminary objections regarding timeliness, jurisdiction, and collateral attack.

The Tribunal found the appeal was timely and that it had jurisdiction to review CFO decisions, but concluded the appeal was an impermissible collateral attack on the CFC's levy decision, which had already been unsuccessfully appealed to the National Farm Products Council.

The appeal was dismissed.

Sure Fresh Foods Inc. v. Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 2009 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 23, 2009

Appeal of penalties for antibiotic-contaminated milk dismissed as evidence confirmed contamination originated on appellant's farm.

Jim Jenkins appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) imposing penalties after a truckload of milk tested positive for inhibitory substances (antibiotics) and was traced back to his farm.

Jenkins argued the contaminated milk did not originate from his farm.

The Tribunal found no flaws in the DFO's sampling and testing procedures and noted that Jenkins' farm practices, such as milking treated cows with equipment connected to the main pipeline and failing to withhold milk for the recommended 72 hours after calving, likely caused the contamination.

The Tribunal upheld the penalties and dismissed the appeal.

Jim Jenkins v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2009 ONAFRAAT 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 17, 2008

Appeal of regulation requiring turkeys to be raised under a solid roof dismissed due to avian influenza risks.

The appellants, organic turkey farmers, appealed a regulation by the Turkey Farmers of Ontario (TFO) requiring turkeys raised in non-confinement or open-air systems to be kept under a solid roof.

The appellants argued this would make organic certification impossible and financially unviable.

The TFO argued the regulation was necessary to prevent the spread of avian influenza from wild birds to domestic flocks.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the TFO was justified in implementing the regulation as a preventative measure against avian influenza, and that the added cost to organic producers was outweighed by the safety benefits to the industry.

Dick v Turkey Farmers of Ontario, 2008 ONAFRAAT 37

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 9, 2008

DFO's implementation of a quota transfer assessment without notice breached procedural fairness; refunds ordered.

The appellants, dairy farmers, appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) denying their requests for exemptions from a 15% quota transfer assessment implemented in November 2006.

The Tribunal found that while the DFO had the legal authority to levy the assessment, it failed to uphold the principles of procedural fairness by implementing the policy without adequate notice or a phase-in period, effectively locking producers into the market and causing significant financial losses.

The Tribunal ordered the DFO to grant the exemptions and refund the transfer assessments to the appellants.

Denby Group v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2008 ONAFRAAT 34

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 28, 2008

Appeal to direct an engineering report for drain improvements dismissed due to scientific and legal impossibility.

The appellants appealed the municipality's failure to appoint a drainage engineer to prepare a report for repairs and improvements to a municipal drain.

The Tribunal found that the proposed improvements were not scientifically practicable because the lower part of the drain was directly controlled by lake levels.

Furthermore, the improvements were not legally possible due to municipal zoning restrictions, provincial wetland designations, and federal fish habitat protections.

The Tribunal declined to exercise its discretion to direct an engineering report and dismissed the appeal.

John Coxon and Damon Srokosz v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2008 ONAFRAAT 33

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 26, 2008

Crop insurance appeal dismissed; appellants bound by their chosen coverage options and rainfall station.

The appellants appealed a decision by Agricorp denying their claim for their 2007 forage crop under the Forage Rainfall Plan.

The appellants argued that the rainfall station used by Agricorp did not accurately reflect the drought conditions on their farm and sought $7,695.00 for additional feed expenses.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellants had chosen the coverage options and rainfall station, and that Agricorp's system for measuring rainfall was fair and equitable.

The Tribunal noted it lacked jurisdiction to order Agricorp to relocate its weather stations.

Aalbers v. Agricorp, 2008 ONAFRAAT 30

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 25, 2008

Tribunal decision set aside due to member's failure to disclose status as active dairy farmer.

The Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) brought a motion requesting a review of a prior Tribunal decision, alleging that one of the panel members had a conflict of interest and a reasonable apprehension of bias.

The member, an active dairy farmer whose farm was subject to DFO regulatory action, failed to disclose his status until after the hearing concluded.

The Tribunal found that the member's failure to disclose his business relationship with the DFO breached the Members' Code of Professional Conduct and could reasonably bring the Tribunal's impartiality into question.

The original decision was set aside and a new hearing ordered.

Cayers v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2008 ONAFRAAT 28

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 25, 2008

Crop insurance appeal dismissed where farmer conceded he was not entitled to retain double payment.

The appellant farmer received a crop insurance payment from Agricorp for his 2005 canola crop, which was initially deemed unmarketable.

Subsequently, the elevator that purchased the crop issued a retroactive payment to the appellant after the crop was regraded and sold.

Agricorp sought to recover the insurance overpayment.

The appellant appealed, arguing the elevator should take the money back directly.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, noting the appellant conceded he was not entitled to keep the double payment and finding it had no jurisdiction to order the elevator to recover the funds.

Parkinson v. Agricorp, 2008 ONAFRAAT 29

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 20, 2008

Tribunal decision set aside due to member's failure to disclose status as active dairy producer.

The Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) brought a motion requesting the Tribunal review and set aside its previous decision regarding an appeal by John and Susanna Cayer.

The DFO argued that one of the panel members, an active dairy farmer with a regulatory history with the DFO, had a conflict of interest and created a reasonable apprehension of bias by failing to disclose his status at the outset of the hearing.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the member's failure to disclose his business relationship with the DFO violated the Members' Code of Professional Conduct and could reasonably bring the public's confidence in the Tribunal's impartiality into question.

The original decision was set aside and a new panel was assigned to rehear the matter.

Cayers v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2008 ONAFRAAT 8

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 18, 2008

Appeal dismissed; producer must repay crop insurance overpayment after receiving retroactive market compensation.

The appellant, a canola producer, received a crop insurance payment from Agricorp for his 2005 canola crop due to drought damage.

Subsequently, the elevator where he delivered the crop issued a retroactive payment reflecting higher market values.

Agricorp demanded repayment of the insurance claim, arguing the appellant could not retain both the insurance payout and the market value.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding it fair and equitable for Agricorp to recover the overpayment, as allowing the appellant to keep both would result in him receiving significantly more per tonne than other producers.

Robert G. Fletcher v. Agricorp, 2008 ONAFRAAT 27

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 17, 2008

Tribunal orders production of engineer's notes in a drainage dispute discovery motion.

The appellants brought a pre-hearing motion for an order for discovery to obtain various documents, including engineer's notes, audio recordings, and drainage machine data, related to the construction of a municipal drain.

The Tribunal ordered the production of the engineer's notes, finding them to be an important part of the process leading to the drain's construction.

The remaining requests were either satisfied by explanations that the records did not exist or were already included in the Tribunal's evidence book.

Finlay and Edith McCormick v. Municipality of North Perth, 2008 CanLII 90113

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 28, 2008

DFO ordered to refund quota transfer assessments due to lack of procedural fairness in policy implementation.

The appellants, dairy farmers, appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) denying their requests for exemptions from a 15% quota transfer assessment implemented in November 2006.

The Tribunal found that while the DFO had the legal authority to levy the assessment, it failed to adhere to the principles of procedural fairness by implementing the policy immediately without adequate notice or consultation, depriving the appellants of the opportunity to manage their business affairs.

The Tribunal ordered the DFO to grant the exemptions and refund the transfer assessments collected from the appellants.

Denby Group v Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2008 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 19, 2008

Drainage Act appeal dismissed regarding assessments and compensation, but drain relocated to protect tree.

The appellants appealed an engineer's report under the Drainage Act regarding the Brown/Iona Road Drain.

They argued their property would not benefit from the drain, the compensation for potential damage to a sugar maple tree and crop loss was inadequate, and the drain should be relocated.

The Tribunal found that the tree was on municipal property and no compensation was warranted, and that the allowances for crop loss were fair.

The Tribunal also found the appellants' property benefited from an improved legal outlet, confirming their assessments.

However, with the agreement of the parties, the Tribunal ordered the engineer to amend the report to relocate the road crossing to protect the sugar maple tree, with the additional costs assessed to the road authorities.

Brown-Iona Road Drain (RE), 2008 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 16, 2008

Drainage assessment appeal granted on consent, restoring original Engineer's Report allocations.

The County of Elgin appealed a decision of the Court of Revision that reallocated a $2,000 benefit assessment for the Richmond Outlet Drain from a private landowner to the County.

At the hearing, all parties, including the assessed landowner, agreed to withdraw the Court of Revision appeal and accept the original Engineer's Report assessments.

The Tribunal granted the appeal and ordered the original schedule of assessments restored.

The Corporation of the County of Elgin v. Municipality of Bayham, 2008 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 28, 2008

Tribunal upholds proposed municipal drain location but adjusts benefit assessments for equitable distribution.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the proposed Winger Road Municipal Drain.

The appellants challenged the location of the drain and the assessments levied against their properties.

The Tribunal upheld the location of the drain as recommended in the engineer's report, finding it maintained a balance of shared responsibility and minimized effects on all properties.

However, the Tribunal ordered adjustments to the benefit assessments to provide a more equitable distribution, decreasing the assessments for downstream properties and increasing the assessment for the upstream property that gained significant outlet benefit.

The Tribunal also ordered modifications to the drain design to protect mature trees and provide buffer protection on the south side of the ditch.

Winger Road Drain (Re), 2008 ONAFRAAT 14

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 23, 2008

Tribunal upholds engineer's report and assessments for municipal drain improvements, with minor modifications.

Appellants appealed an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision regarding the Bearss Drain West Branch West in the City of Port Colborne.

The appellants argued that the proposed drainage works (option 1) were not the most suitable solution and that the assessments were unfair.

The Tribunal found that the engineer applied sound engineering principles in recommending option 1 and that the assessments were fair and equitable, with the exception of one appellant whose land use was reclassified as a managed forest.

The appeals were largely denied, with minor modifications ordered to the report and construction methodology.

Bearss Drain (RE), 2008 ONAFRAAT 3

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 2, 2008

Crop insurance appeal granted; excess rain preventing harvest found to be an insurable peril.

The appellant appealed a decision by Agricorp concerning the adjustment of his claim for his 2006 white kidney bean crop.

Agricorp argued the appellant breached his crop insurance contract by failing to harvest the crop, attributing the loss to inadequate farm practices rather than an insured peril.

The Tribunal found that the appellant used good farm management practices and that excessive rain and wet field conditions made harvesting impractical.

The Tribunal concluded that the excess rain constituted an insurable peril and ordered Agricorp to pay the full value of the claim.

Wright v. Agricorp, 2008 ONAFRAAT 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 28, 2007

Appeal of drainage assessment denied; engineer's calculation of oversizing costs using sound principles upheld.

The appellants appealed an engineer's report under section 48(1) of the Drainage Act regarding the Moore Drain.

The report recommended incorporating existing storm sewers into the municipal drain and assessed the appellants for the costs of oversizing and extending the drain previously constructed by a neighbouring developer.

The appellants argued the assessment was unfair and the municipality was deviating from the Act.

The Tribunal denied the appeal, finding that the engineer employed sound engineering principles in calculating the assessments, the municipality did not deviate from section 31 of the Act, and the appellants provided no expert evidence to refute the engineer's calculations.

John Szintai and Carina Bruggeman v. Municipality of Thames Centre, 2007 ONAFRAAT 30

Page 4 of 6 (111 cases)

appellant

Henry BosSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Alan CunningtonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Carolyn BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
David BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Diana HammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Finlay McCormickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
George VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gladys DufourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helmut FunkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeanette JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PetropoulosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph PruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith EmmettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ludmila DejmekSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ronald PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn ParkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Kenneth PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marian EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and assessed landowner

Jackie OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis VargaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea ClemencioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Clifford TattersallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant, and assessed landowner

Robert GregsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant/Landowner

Georges BicrelSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants

Moira DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andy HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellants

Rainer PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lynne PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance

applicant

John VieraitisSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Tony RitolaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
William TiessenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andre CartierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claire GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cliff IvensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earl HardingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edwin ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Garry SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry KellerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hugh WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jan Van NulandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lew AcreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liz BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maggie WahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed landowner

Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter SemowoniukSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed Landowner

Karen WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, appellant

Paul BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Barbara BalogSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assistant to counsel for Appellant

Curtis CleeverCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the Municipality of North Perth

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
3 appearances

counsel for the Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Cheryl BiehlerCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp

Karin RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp, the respondent

Rebecca GivenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mike Koczycki appellant

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Julian FalconerCounsel
2 appearances
Sunil MathaiCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario, respondent

Geoffrey SpurCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Ontario Milk Transport Association, appellant

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Township of Perth South

Gerry CullitonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Clerk

Dianne WilsonAgent
1 appearance

Director, Drainage Division for the municipality

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for the Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
Elizabeth JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Harold HallAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Township of Southwold, assessed landowner

Brent ClutterbuckAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Corporation of the County of Essex, appellant

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the municipality

Tim OliverAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Report

Bill DietrichAgent
1 appearance

Engineer on behalf of the Municipality

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

Engineer, on behalf of the Municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Jeff DicksonAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Mike P. DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

John KuntzeAgent
3 appearances
J.R. (Jeff) DicksonAgent
2 appearances
Gerard RoodAgent
2 appearances
John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Paul SmeltzerAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance
Raymond DobbinAgent
1 appearance
R.O. (Ray) DobbinAgent
1 appearance
John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for all of the appellants

Timothy FlanneryCounsel
1 appearance

for Amico Properties Inc.

Cindy PrinceAgent
1 appearance

for Brian Whelan

Larry PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Brunato Farms Limited, Assessed Landowner

James CookCounsel
1 appearance

for CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Janet CioruchAgent
1 appearance

for CLPA Inc., assessed landowner

Barbara RozakAgent
1 appearance
Tony RozakAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance
Frank DevetAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers (Conestoga 3P)

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance

for Daniel Neufeld, assessed landowner

William NeufeldAgent
2 appearances

for De Wetering Hill Farms

Teresa De WeteringAgent
2 appearances

for Districts 10, 11 and 12 Pork Producers

Bruce HudsonAgent
1 appearance
Rob de WoldeAgent
1 appearance

for Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

for Grant and Sharon Wolfe and Jim Wolfe, Assessed Landowners

M. Paul DownsCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Elaine HeyinkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and Eckro Precision

Terry EckertSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Bud KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Clare HartleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jay MaxnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CampbellSelf-represented
1 appearance
William YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Huron County Pork Producers' Association

Grant LoveAgent
2 appearances
John Vander BurgtAgent
2 appearances

for intervenor, the Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Herman TurkstraCounsel
1 appearance

for John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth and Lynda Anderson

Dennis H. AsherCounsel
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods (Maple Leaf)

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Mitri

G. MeakingsCounsel
1 appearance

for Mr. Schives, the petitioner

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board

Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Kim MullinCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board (Ontario Pork)

Maryann HendrikxAgent
1 appearance
Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Patricia Larkin, assessed landowner

Joseph LarkinAgent
1 appearance

for Pyramid Farms, assessed landowner

Dean TiessenAgent
1 appearance
William TiessenAgent
1 appearance

for Quality Meat Packers

Dan CohoeAgent
2 appearances
Jim GracieAgent
1 appearance

for Rein Minnema

Elbert van DonkersgoedAgent
2 appearances

for respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

Graham LloydCounsel
2 appearances

for Sure Fresh Foods Inc.

Andrew HealCounsel
1 appearance
Hank Van VoorstAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms

James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms (Synergy et al.)

Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
2 appearances
Carina BruggemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris MastersonAgent
1 appearance
Damon SrokoszSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
Jim MastersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CoxonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Matthew DickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael AllemanoCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Rick GrimaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sher HelmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom BradishSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry CardCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne HartungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Donald MurneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary ArtsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Max IlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael LabaCounsel
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance
Wilhelm GreisbachSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Frank Pohorly

Steven PohorlyAgent
1 appearance
Susan PohorlyAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellant, Gubbels Farms Ltd.

Jim CaskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Paul and Nancy Brown

John WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ruedel Farms Inc.

John TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Cheryl LenehanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Jeannine MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard MetcalfeAgent
1 appearance
Terry MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Wyatt Stetler and 934671 Ontario Limited

Burton TaitCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Alvaro VenturelliUnion representative
1 appearance
Ann SlaterUnion representative
1 appearance
Don MillsUnion representative
1 appearance
John SutherlandUnion representative
1 appearance
Peter DowlingUnion representative
1 appearance

for the CFFO

Lorne SmallAgent
2 appearances
Henry StevensAgent
1 appearance
John ClementAgent
1 appearance
Gerald PoechmanAgent
1 appearance
Nathan StevensAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne, respondent

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the County of Elgin, the appellant

Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance

for the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Alex HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Ross CrawfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Kristopher Crawford-DickinsonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Municipality

Janet McGuigan-KellyCounsel
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ruth OrtonCounsel
1 appearance
Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance
Steven ShoemakerCounsel
1 appearance
Wray RamsayAgent
1 appearance
Gerry LeggAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Bayham

Bill KniftonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of North Perth

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre, respondent

David A. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the NFU-O

Don MillsAgent
1 appearance
Alvaro VenturelliAgent
1 appearance
Ann SlaterAgent
1 appearance
John SutherlandAgent
1 appearance
Michael SchmidtAgent
1 appearance
Peter DowlingAgent
1 appearance
Rae MacIntyreAgent
1 appearance
Sean McGivernAgent
1 appearance
Steve DickAgent
1 appearance

for the OFA

Lori PerkesAgent
3 appearances
Neil CurrieAgent
3 appearances
Jason BentAgent
1 appearance
Mark WalesAgent
1 appearance

for The Open Marketing Group

Brian SimpsonAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent

Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Rebecca GivensCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John BarkovicAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, OFCTGMB

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Ontario Processing Vegetable Growers

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board

Barry H. BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Amherstburg

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Turkey Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town

David H. GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Amherstburg

Eric ChamberlainAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Fort Erie

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Middlesex Centre, respondent

Andrew WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the upstream agricultural appellants

Janet McGuigan KellyCounsel
1 appearance

for Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

for Wilhemina Van Raay, assessed landowner

Bert Van RaayAgent
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc.

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc. (Zantingh)

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

landowner

Doug JohnstonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Thomas GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for the Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Diana Hamm

Victor HammAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Municipality

Colin G. TriversAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality of West Perth

Mike KraemerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Lakeshore, respondent

Edward DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Phair Systems Ltd., respondent

Bill PhairAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

Ben Van DiepenbeekAgent
1 appearance

representative for Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Karin Gagne, appellant

Daniel DevereuxAgent
1 appearance
Ed DykstraAgent
1 appearance

representative for the respondent

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Arturo AgueroAgent
1 appearance

representative of Leanne Landers and Stephen Herman, appellants

Barbara HermanAgent
1 appearance

representative of the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
3 appearances

representative of upstream agricultural owners

John McGuiganAgent
1 appearance

representing appellant Percy and Gladys Dufour

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner S. Proctor

John ProctorAgent
1 appearance

representing Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

representing George Vanderbeke, assessed landowner

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

representing Marion Piggott

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

representing Percy Steele, assessed landowner

Jack SteeleAgent
1 appearance

representing Shevaun Day, an appellant

Steve VoisinAgent
1 appearance

representing the appellants

Roderick McCormickAgent
1 appearance

representing the City of Kawartha Lakes

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing the municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

Secretary/Treasurer of 517749 Ontario Ltd on behalf of Mr. Mario Valletta, assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Lucy VallettaAgent
1 appearance

the appellant

Jeff CridlandSelf-represented
1 appearance

the Engineer who prepared the Report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

111

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.7

cases/mo

OAFRAAT111(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 4 of 6 (111 cases)