Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 21, 2011

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant merely sought to reargue the case.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her application following a summary hearing on the basis that it was an abuse of process and had no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant argued that the decision should be reconsidered under Rule 26.5(a), (c), and (d) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant merely disputed the correctness of the decision, repeated arguments made at the summary hearing, and raised new arguments that could have been made earlier.

The Tribunal noted that reconsideration is not an appeal or an opportunity to reargue a case.

Anderson v. Lerners LLP, 2011 HRTO 2101

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 18, 2011

Request for reconsideration dismissed as the applicant's delay in filing was not incurred in good faith.

The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her application.

The request was filed more than 30 days after the decision.

The applicant cited medical reasons for the delay, but the provided medical documents did not explain her inability to file on time.

The Tribunal found the delay was not incurred in good faith and dismissed the Request for Reconsideration.

Margaret Way v. Coalition Against Psychiatric Assault, 2011 HRTO 2091

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 17, 2011

Organization respondent ordered to produce staff contact details to individual respondent for hearing purposes.

In an ongoing human rights proceeding, the individual respondent requested the contact details of witnesses and other staff from the organization respondent, which had terminated his employment and ceased participating in the hearing.

The Tribunal ordered the organization respondent or its Board to immediately deliver and file the last known contact details for all staff from January 1, 2007, to the present.

Malika Mounir v. Brampton Neighbourhood Resource Centre, 2011 HRTO 2084

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 14, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a hearing and sent a Confirmation of Hearing notice to the parties.

Neither party attended the hearing at the scheduled time, nor did they communicate with the Tribunal to explain their absence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Sharron Allen-Richards v. Toronto District School Board and Joanne Janke, 2011 HRTO 2054

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 4, 2011

Request to reconsider personal liability for human rights violations dismissed as respondents were directing minds.

The individual respondents requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that found them jointly and severally liable with the corporate respondent for human rights violations.

They argued they were not the directing minds of the organization and that personal liability should not be imposed.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the individual respondents were the directing minds, were personally and centrally involved in the acts of discrimination and reprisal, and acted outside the scope of their employment duties.

The Tribunal also noted concerns about the corporate respondent's ability to pay the damages.

Knibbs v. Brant Artillery Gunners Club, 2011 HRTO 2005

Richard Miller

43 cases2005–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 31, 2011

Tribunal orders parties to determine organization respondent's insolvency status after it failed to appear.

The organization respondent failed to appear for the continuation of a human rights hearing.

The applicant and individual respondent informed the Tribunal that the organization might be insolvent.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision noting that if the organization is insolvent, proceedings against it may be stayed under section 69 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The Tribunal ordered the parties to take reasonable steps to determine the organization's status and advise the Tribunal.

Malika Mounir v. Brampton Neighbourhood Resource Centre and Anthony Hutchinson, 2011 HRTO 1964

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 19, 2011

Application withdrawn and scheduled hearing cancelled at applicant's request.

The applicant requested to cancel his human rights application and stop the scheduled hearing.

The respondent sought confirmation of the withdrawal.

The Tribunal granted the applicant leave to withdraw the application and cancelled the hearing.

Walji v. Hewlett Packard (HP) Canada, 2011 HRTO 1887

J. Paul R. Howard

11 cases2003–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 18, 2011

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend scheduled summary hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

A summary hearing was scheduled by conference call to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to call into the hearing at the scheduled time.

The Tribunal dismissed the application due to the applicant's non-attendance, noting that the applicant's subsequent explanation for missing the start time was nonsensical and did not justify rescheduling.

Daniel Graham v. City of Hamilton, 2011 HRTO 1874

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 17, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with disclosure rules and respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After failing to comply with the Tribunal's rules regarding the disclosure of documents and witnesses, the applicant informed the respondents' counsel that he would not attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant subsequently failed to respond to the Tribunal's correspondence inquiring whether he intended to proceed.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Daniel King v. ELRUS General Partnership and Phil Garinger, 2011 HRTO 1868

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 13, 2011

Adjournment of summary hearing denied as applicant failed to show extraordinary circumstances.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing, citing her disability, work commitments, and family issues.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the reasons provided were either too vague or did not constitute extraordinary circumstances as required by the Tribunal's Practice Direction for adjournment requests made after the 14-day window.

S.D. v. Grand River Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1861

Request to amend human rights application to increase monetary damages granted.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend her human rights application to increase the monetary damages sought and to put the respondents on notice to retain her personnel file.

The respondents opposed the request, arguing the new remedy was vague and the damages too remote.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that the amendments related to relief sought rather than new allegations, and that there was no prejudice to the respondents as a hearing had not yet been scheduled.

Reeves v. Case N’ Drum Oil LP, 2011 HRTO 1839

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 12, 2011

Application against Canada Post dismissed for lack of provincial jurisdiction over federal undertakings.

The applicant filed a human rights application against Canada Post Corporation, Manulife Financial, and several individual employees.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding Canada Post and its employees on the basis that Canada Post is a federal undertaking.

The applicant acknowledged the jurisdictional issue but argued the application pertained to her status as a First Nations person in Ontario.

The Tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction over Canada Post and its employees, as postal service is a federal undertaking under the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application against Canada Post and its employees was dismissed, while the application against Manulife Financial and its employees was allowed to proceed.

Kaboni v. Canada Post Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1832

Vicky Satta

4 cases2011–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 7, 2011

Request for interim remedy to halt workplace discipline denied; balance of harm did not favour applicant.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace harassment and discrimination based on race, ancestry, place of origin, citizenship, ethnic origin, and age.

He subsequently filed a Request for Interim Remedy seeking an order to stop the respondents from disciplining him, alleging reprisal.

The Tribunal denied the interim remedy, finding that the applicant failed to establish that the balance of harm favoured granting the request, as the Tribunal could reinstate and compensate him if a Code violation was ultimately found.

The Tribunal also granted the union's request to intervene and issued procedural directions regarding the addition of a corporate respondent and service on a former employee.

Ainmelk v. Jeoffrey, 2011 HRTO 1825

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 6, 2011

Human rights application stayed due to respondent's notice of intention to make a proposal.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement alleging the respondent failed to pay general damages as agreed.

The respondent filed a Response stating it had filed a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The Tribunal found the proceedings were stayed pursuant to s. 69 of the BIA and directed the applicant to advise within one year if the stay is lifted.

Ron Reardon v. Tracan Electronics Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1821

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 5, 2011

Tribunal ordered respondent's doctor to provide medical opinion on fitness to testify.

In an interim decision following a multi-day hearing, the applicant sought an adverse inference because the individual respondent was not called to testify.

The respondents claimed he was medically unfit to testify but provided minimal medical documentation.

On consent of the parties, the Tribunal ordered the individual respondent's doctor to provide an opinion on his medical fitness to testify during the hearing dates, and set a schedule for closing submissions.

Natalina Garofalo v. Cavalier Hair Stylists Shop Inc. and Joseph Finelli, 2011 HRTO 1810

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 5, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to early dismissal request.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination based on disability.

The respondent requested an early dismissal, noting the applicant had signed a full and final release shortly after filing the application.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to respond to the request, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Wade Norman v. Nortrax Canada Inc., 2011 HRTO 1809

Nancy Jammu-Taylor

15 cases2006–2020

Mary Jane Campigotto

In Private Practice6 cases2011–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 3, 2011

Hearing adjourned due to applicant's extraordinary circumstances; further submissions ordered on civil settlement release.

The applicant requested to reschedule a hearing date, citing non-receipt of the Notice of Confirmation of Hearing and health issues causing fatigue, which led to inadvertently scheduling another matter on the same date.

The respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal found that the applicant identified extraordinary circumstances justifying an adjournment and cancelled the scheduled hearing dates.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to provide further written submissions on the outstanding issue of whether the settlement of a related civil suit included a Release.

Moncur v. Beach Grove Golf and Country Club, 2011 HRTO 1792

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 3, 2011

Age discrimination application dismissed due to applicant's inconsistent evidence and failure to meet burden of proof.

The applicant, a 62-year-old floor installer, alleged that the respondents discriminated against him based on age by telling him he was too old to work for them.

The respondents denied the allegation and provided evidence that the manager was in Florida on the date the comment was allegedly made.

The Tribunal found the respondents' evidence credible and consistent, while the applicant's evidence was shifting and inconsistent.

The application was dismissed as the applicant failed to prove discrimination on a balance of probabilities.

Sobun v. The Floor Shop, 2011 HRTO 1788

Lambert Boenders

In Private Practice2 cases2011–2015

James D. Heeney

3 cases2010–2011

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2011

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing as allegations of discrimination were merely speculative.

The applicant, a temporary legal assistant, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, place of origin, marital status, and reprisal against a law firm and a staffing agency after she was not considered for a subsequent job opening.

The respondents requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations were merely speculative and accusatory, and there was no reasonable prospect that she could prove a link between the respondents' actions and any Code grounds.

The application was dismissed.

Andrea Anderson v. Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP and Robert Half International, 2011 HRTO 1762

J. Paul Wearing

16 cases1984–2016

Alan G. McConnell

11 cases2008–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 19, 2011

Adjournment granted due to applicant's deportation and pending visa application.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the hearing until February 2012 because he was deported from Canada after his refugee claim was denied, but he married a Canadian citizen and expected to receive a visa to return.

The respondents opposed the request, arguing the applicant had no standing and that a delay would prejudice their ability to call witnesses.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's deportation constituted extraordinary circumstances justifying an adjournment and that there was no concrete evidence of prejudice to the respondents.

The request for an adjournment was granted, with the rescheduled dates made peremptory to the applicant.

Hetem Zeqiri v. Sanjak Aluminum Inc. and Ergin Kalac, 2011 HRTO 1709

Page 19 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 19 of 29 (567 cases)

Ken Bhattacharjee

Anderson v. Lerners LLP, 2011 HRTO 2101

Ken Bhattacharjee

Margaret Way v. Coalition Against Psychiatric Assault, 2011 HRTO 2091

Ken Bhattacharjee

Malika Mounir v. Brampton Neighbourhood Resource Centre, 2011 HRTO 2084

Ken Bhattacharjee

Sharron Allen-Richards v. Toronto District School Board and Joanne Janke, 2011 HRTO 2054

Ken Bhattacharjee

Knibbs v. Brant Artillery Gunners Club, 2011 HRTO 2005

Richard Miller

Ken Bhattacharjee

Malika Mounir v. Brampton Neighbourhood Resource Centre and Anthony Hutchinson, 2011 HRTO 1964

Ken Bhattacharjee

Walji v. Hewlett Packard (HP) Canada, 2011 HRTO 1887

J. Paul R. Howard

Ken Bhattacharjee

Daniel Graham v. City of Hamilton, 2011 HRTO 1874

Ken Bhattacharjee

Daniel King v. ELRUS General Partnership and Phil Garinger, 2011 HRTO 1868

Ken Bhattacharjee

S.D. v. Grand River Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1861

Laurie B. Jessome

Kevin A. Egan

Ken Bhattacharjee

Reeves v. Case N’ Drum Oil LP, 2011 HRTO 1839

Ken Bhattacharjee

Kaboni v. Canada Post Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1832

Vicky Satta

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ainmelk v. Jeoffrey, 2011 HRTO 1825

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ron Reardon v. Tracan Electronics Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1821

Ken Bhattacharjee

Natalina Garofalo v. Cavalier Hair Stylists Shop Inc. and Joseph Finelli, 2011 HRTO 1810

Ken Bhattacharjee

Wade Norman v. Nortrax Canada Inc., 2011 HRTO 1809

Nancy Jammu-Taylor

Mary Jane Campigotto

Ken Bhattacharjee

Moncur v. Beach Grove Golf and Country Club, 2011 HRTO 1792

Ken Bhattacharjee

Sobun v. The Floor Shop, 2011 HRTO 1788

Lambert Boenders

James D. Heeney

Ken Bhattacharjee

Andrea Anderson v. Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP and Robert Half International, 2011 HRTO 1762

J. Paul Wearing

Alan G. McConnell

Ken Bhattacharjee

Hetem Zeqiri v. Sanjak Aluminum Inc. and Ergin Kalac, 2011 HRTO 1709

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

for the Affected Organization

for the Affected Party

for the Applicant