Union application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application against the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
Time for filing request for review of Order to Pay extended due to short delay.
The applicant employer requested a review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
The application was filed three days after the 45-day statutory deadline.
The Board exercised its discretion under section 68(4) of the Act to extend the time for filing, noting the short delay and that the requisite monies had been paid into trust.
Appeal of Order to Pay terminated for failure to file required application forms.
The applicant sought to appeal an Order to Pay but failed to file the formal application on the proper forms as required by the Board's Rules of Procedure.
Despite being sent the required forms and given a 10-day deadline, the applicant did not file the application.
The Board terminated the matter.
Board confirms trade union status of applicant following name change and issues certification.
The applicant union applied for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
A representation vote was held, but the Board required the applicant to establish its trade union status due to a recent name change and affiliation change.
The Board found that the applicant was the same organization as its predecessor, having simply changed its name with the authorization of the General President.
The Board confirmed the applicant's trade union status, noted that the representation vote was successful, and ordered that a certificate issue.
Representation vote directed in construction industry certification application, with ballot box sealed pending status dispute.
The applicant trade union council applied for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party claimed it had no employees in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support and directed a representation vote for the proposed bargaining unit of electricians and apprentices, with the ballot box to be sealed pending resolution of the employee status dispute.
Time for filing employment standards appeal extended where application was mailed before deadline but arrived one day late.
The applicant employer filed an application for review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
The application was received one day after the 45-day statutory deadline.
The Board exercised its discretion under section 68(4) of the Act to extend the time for filing, noting that the application and requisite funds were mailed prior to the deadline and the delay was due to the mail system.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for a period not exceeding one year.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the matter sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the union and the Ministry of Labour.
Board directs representation vote in displacement application and declines intervenor's request to seal ballot box.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board directed a representation vote.
The intervenor raised objections based on alleged unfair labour practices and requested that the ballot box be sealed.
The Board declined to seal the ballot box, noting that similar objections had been dismissed in other recent displacement applications involving the same unions.
The applicant, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 793, filed an application against the responding party, Clement Utility Contractors Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision granting the applicant leave to withdraw the application.
Employer's open-ended request to hold an appeal in abeyance denied; matter adjourned for one month.
The applicant employer filed a request for review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
The applicant requested that no further action be taken until it advised the Board it wished to proceed, without providing a timeline or reason.
The Board found this open-ended request unreasonable, as it prejudiced the employee.
The Board granted a one-month adjournment, after which the application would proceed in the normal course.
Union's application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Default judgment granted against employer for failure to pay termination pay under collective agreement.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding employer failed to pay termination pay to the grievor.
The responding party failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.
Proceeding by way of default, the Board accepted the applicant's facts as true, found the employer violated the collective agreements, and ordered the payment of $4,730.20 in termination pay plus filing fees.
Application terminated following settlement between the parties.
The applicant filed an application against the responding parties.
Having regard to the settlement reached between the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the application terminated.
Board decision amended to correct a typographical error in a file number.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief decision to correct a typographical error in its previous decision dated June 5, 2000.
The Board amended paragraph 2 of that decision to correctly refer to Board File No. 3973-99-G instead of 3793-99-G.
Request for reconsideration of time extension dismissed as applicant filed within 45 days of receiving re-sent Order.
The Ministry of Labour requested reconsideration of a Board decision that extended the time for an applicant to file an application for review of an Order to Pay.
The Ministry argued the Order was properly served on February 1, 2000, to the address on the Corporation Profile Report, rather than February 23, 2000, when it was re-sent to a new address.
The Board declined to reconsider, noting that the applicant did not receive the Order in a timely manner because the original address was out of date, and the application was filed within 45 days of the Order being re-sent.
Board orders disclosure of future facility plans in related employer application but dismisses section 70 interference claim.
The applicant union filed an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding parties raised two preliminary objections.
First, they sought to strike a paragraph in the application regarding future plans for a permanent long-term care facility, arguing it was premature and lacked material facts.
The Board dismissed this objection, ordering the responding parties to disclose their plans and produce relevant documents, as the information was arguably relevant to the union's case.
Second, the responding hospital objected to the union's allegation that contracting out the work breached section 70 of the Act.
The Board upheld this objection, finding no prima facie case of anti-union animus and concluding the matter was better suited for grievance arbitration.