Deborah J.D. Leighton

The grievor alleged that he was improperly denied overtime.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration under the collective agreement and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board dismissed the grievance.

The union filed grievances claiming overtime entitlement for the grievors based on Minutes of Settlement signed between OPSEU Local 108 and the Ministry.

The parties referred the matter to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Vice-Chair dismissed the grievances after considering the submissions and jurisprudence.

The grievor alleged he was wrongly denied compassionate leave and required to use a vacation day.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The arbitrator ordered the employer to reimburse the grievor's vacation bank with one day.

The grievor, an unclassified correctional officer, alleged she did not receive her 40 hours of work before overtime was assigned to classified correctional officers.

The parties referred the grievances to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Vice-Chair dismissed the grievances after considering the submissions and jurisprudence.

The grievors filed grievances alleging that it was unreasonable that they be pepper sprayed in order to pass the community escort training program.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board dismissed the grievances.

The grievor filed three grievances claiming improper denial of overtime.

The parties referred the grievances to mediation/arbitration under the collective agreement and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board dismissed the grievances.

The grievor filed grievances alleging he was improperly denied overtime.

The parties referred the grievances to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The arbitrator ordered the employer to pay the grievor 18 hours at straight time.

The grievor alleged that he was improperly denied overtime.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board dismissed the grievance.

The union filed grievances alleging that the grievor was improperly denied overtime.

The parties referred the grievances to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board dismissed the grievances.

The grievor alleged unfair treatment regarding a job competition.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration under the collective agreement and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board ordered the employer to accommodate the grievor in the Clerk IV Supply position on a permanent basis and to red-circle his current rate of pay for six months.

The union filed grievances claiming overtime entitlement for the grievor based on Minutes of Settlement signed between OPSEU Local 108 and the Ministry.

The parties referred the matter to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The Vice-Chair dismissed the grievances.

The grievor claimed overtime entitlement based on Minutes of Settlement signed between the union and the employer.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration and requested a decision without written reasons.

The arbitrator dismissed the grievance.

The parties reached a memorandum of agreement regarding the application of holiday provisions to part-time employees under the Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act.

The Grievance Settlement Board issued a consent order incorporating the memorandum of agreement, which clarified that the holiday provisions in section 58 of Regulation 977 of the Public Service Act do not apply to part-time employees, and that a previous decision of the Board shall not be relied upon as precedent.

The union filed grievances alleging that the employer discriminated against the grievors through unfair hiring practices regarding wage scale progression and starting salary, and that the issue was handled inconsistently across institutions.

The parties referred the matter to mediation/arbitration and requested a without prejudice decision with no reasons.

The arbitrator dismissed the grievances.

The union filed a grievance alleging that the grievor was improperly denied overtime opportunities on four occasions.

The parties referred the matter to mediation/arbitration and requested a without prejudice decision with no reasons.

The arbitrator dismissed the grievance.

The union filed a grievance alleging that the grievor was denied overtime because a manager performed bargaining unit duties for an extended period.

The parties referred the matter to mediation/arbitration and requested a without prejudice decision with no reasons.

The Grievance Settlement Board dismissed the grievance.

The union filed a grievance alleging that management failed to follow the overtime protocol at E.M.D.C. by allowing a regular part-time employee to fill hours above their status at straight time.

The parties referred the matter to mediation-arbitration and requested a without prejudice decision with no reasons.

The arbitrator dismissed the grievance.

The union grieved that the grievor was not given enough time to respond to a call-in for an overtime shift.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation/arbitration and requested a without prejudice decision with no reasons.

The Vice-Chair dismissed the grievance.

The union filed a grievance alleging that the grievor was not given suitable time to respond to a call for an overtime shift.

The parties referred the grievance to mediation-arbitration and requested a without prejudice decision with no reasons.

The Vice-Chair dismissed the grievance.

The grievor filed a grievance alleging discrimination based on disability and union activity after failing to secure an interview for a job competition.

The grievor, who was no longer an employee of the Ontario Public Service, did not attend the mediation-arbitration hearing.

The employer requested particulars of the discrimination allegations.

The Vice-Chair issued an oral order, confirmed in this decision, requiring the union to provide full particulars of the allegations to the employer by a specified date.