Who is Christopher A. Ferguson?

Christopher A. Ferguson is a adjudicator at the Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal with 142 decisions on record from 2017 to 2020. Key areas include statutory accident benefits schedule matters (sabs), other tribunals, administrative law.

What tribunal does Christopher A. Ferguson sit on?

Christopher A. Ferguson sits on the Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Christopher A. Ferguson decide?

Christopher A. Ferguson's most common areas include Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule matters (SABS) (142 decisions), Other Tribunals (4 decisions), Administrative Law (2 decisions). Christopher A. Ferguson has handled 142 decisions across 3 areas.

How many decisions has Christopher A. Ferguson made?

Christopher A. Ferguson has 142 decisions on record from 2017 to 2020.

Who frequently appears before Christopher A. Ferguson?

Representatives who frequently appear before Christopher A. Ferguson include Lisa Bishop, Nathalie Rosenthall, Loreto Scarola.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Christopher A. Ferguson — Adjudicator

Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule matters (SABS)

Other Tribunals

Administrative Law

Christopher A. Ferguson

Adjudicator·Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal·Since 2017

142

cases · 4 yrs · OLAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Adjudicator· 140Adjudicator· 2

OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalAug 1, 2017

Insurer must pay OCF-18 preparation fees and HST in addition to the $2,000 assessment cap.

The applicant sought payment for the cost of preparing two Treatment and Assessment Plans (OCF-18s) and the applicable HST, which the respondent insurer had denied on the basis that the costs were included in the $2,000 cap for assessments under s. 25(5) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.

The Tribunal found that, pursuant to the Superintendent's Guidelines, the fee for preparing an OCF-18 and the applicable HST are separate from and payable in addition to the fees and expenses for conducting an assessment.

The applicant's claims for the OCF-18 fees and HST were granted, but requests for a special award and costs were dismissed as the respondent's denial was based on an interpretation of the regulation and did not constitute bad faith.

H. A. v. Aviva General Insurance, 2017 CanLII 56678

OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalAug 1, 2017

Application for accident benefits dismissed as treatment plans were not reasonable and necessary.

The applicant sought payment for chiropractic and psychological treatment plans following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent insurer argued it was not liable due to the applicant's failure to provide requested medical records under s. 33 of the Schedule.

The Tribunal found the requested information was not reasonably required, as the insurer had already denied the claims on their merits.

However, on the substantive issues, the Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that neither treatment plan was reasonable and necessary given the preponderance of medical evidence, including multiple insurer examinations indicating no further need for treatment and a lengthy gap in seeking treatment.

The respondent's request for costs was also denied.

S. U. v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2017 CanLII 59508

Page 8 of 8 (142 cases)

Counsel for Applicant

Joe I. KositskyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the applicant

Douglas WrightCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the respondent

Rupinder K. TatlaCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

W. Rosalind EastmondCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Julia LogoutovaParalegal
2 appearances
Syed M. RazaCounsel
2 appearances
Nader FathiParalegal
1 appearance
Nadim BarsoumCounsel
1 appearance
Nathan TischlerCounsel
1 appearance
Philip Kai Kwong YeungCounsel
1 appearance
Sandra D' AlessandroParalegal
1 appearance
Tanis BoltCounsel
1 appearance
Olga KanevskyParalegal
1 appearance
Imtiaz HoseinCounsel
1 appearance
Jackie CalderonCounsel
1 appearance
Maciek R. PiekoszCounsel
1 appearance
Matthew BarteauxCounsel
1 appearance
Michelle F. JorgeCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Arvin GuptaParalegal
1 appearance
Dale RosenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Davide V. CortinovisCounsel
1 appearance
Essam ElbasiouniParalegal
1 appearance
Gregory BrownAgent
1 appearance
Joelle Briggs-SearsCounsel
1 appearance
Loreto ScarolaCounsel
1 appearance
Roshni SharmaCounsel
1 appearance
William A.G. SimpsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Lisa BishopCounsel
5 appearances
Nathalie RosenthallCounsel
3 appearances
Loreto ScarolaParalegal
3 appearances
Olga PoznyakovaParalegal
2 appearances
Michael WentzelParalegal
2 appearances
Matthew D. ReidCounsel
2 appearances
Francesco BlasiParalegal
2 appearances
Victoria PolyakevichParalegal
2 appearances
Alexei AntonovCounsel
2 appearances
Anna KorolkovaParalegal
2 appearances
David CarranzaParalegal
2 appearances
Claudia BatistaCounsel
1 appearance
Darcy RomaineCounsel
1 appearance
Helen ChiassonCounsel
1 appearance
David DerfelCounsel
1 appearance
David J. GillespieCounsel
1 appearance
Denis ChubarParalegal
1 appearance
Devika MaharajCounsel
1 appearance
Dharshika PathmanathanCounsel
1 appearance
Elvis ViskovicCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant in this motion [insurer]

Sharla BandoquilloCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jason R. FrostCounsel
1 appearance
Michal BauraCounsel
1 appearance
David RaposoCounsel
1 appearance
Peter A.B. DurantCounsel
1 appearance
Renate EschlboeckCounsel
1 appearance
Robert H. RogersCounsel
1 appearance
Tamara E. BroderCounsel
1 appearance
Brian YungCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce KeayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Monica PathakCounsel
3 appearances
James SchmidtCounsel
3 appearances
Nabila MajidzadehCounsel
2 appearances
Geoffrey KeatingCounsel
2 appearances
Jane CvijanCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda FowlerCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha MasonCounsel
2 appearances
Shannon MulhollandCounsel
2 appearances
Maia AbbasCounsel
2 appearances
Shirline ApiouCounsel
2 appearances
Ken YipCounsel
2 appearances
Geoffrey L. KeatingCounsel
2 appearances
Gina NardellaCounsel
2 appearances
Jonathan TatnerCounsel
2 appearances
Karla GnanasegaramCounsel
2 appearances
Arthur R. CamporeseCounsel
2 appearances
Andrew McKagueCounsel
2 appearances
Tim GillibrandCounsel
2 appearances
Tripta SoodCounsel
2 appearances
Angela ComellaCounsel
2 appearances

for the respondent in this motion [claimant]

Maciek R. PiekoszCounsel
1 appearance

142

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

4.6

cases/mo

OLAT142(100%)

Decision types

trial

appeal

motion

Page 8 of 8 (142 cases)