Unopposed motion for simultaneous trial declined due to deficient motion materials and missing pleadings.
The defendant brought an unopposed motion in writing seeking an order for the simultaneous or sequential trial of the main action, a third-party claim, and a related action arising from the same motor vehicle accident.
The court declined to sign the draft order due to several deficiencies in the motion materials, including the failure to provide all relevant pleadings, the lack of information regarding the mode of trial (jury or non-jury), and the failure to file proper notices of non-opposition from the responding parties.
The court provided directions for the defendant to file supplementary materials to correct these deficiencies.
Longley v. Crogie, 2022 ONSC 2044