Union certification application dismissed after failing to win majority in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty percent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.
Representation vote directed in displacement application for union certification.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it had established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees to determine whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor union.
Board directs representation vote in displacement application for certification.
The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken to determine whether the employees wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.
Representation vote directed in displacement application for certification.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be held to allow employees to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application for certification by CAW-Canada.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support (not less than 40%) in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees to determine whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Canadian Cereal Workers, CLC Local 101, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties, Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and Kraft Canada Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Union certification granted following successful representation vote and agreement on bargaining unit description.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with the parties agreeing on the bargaining unit description, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a final decision without a hearing.
A certificate was issued to the applicant.
Applicant directed to re-deliver application for termination of bargaining rights after responding party claimed non-receipt.
The applicant filed an application for termination of bargaining rights and claimed to have delivered it to the responding party via Xpresspost.
The responding party's counsel informed the Board that the application was not received.
The Board directed the applicant to deliver a further copy of the application and file a new certificate of delivery, giving the responding party ten days from receipt to file a response.
Matter deemed terminated on consent of the parties.
The applicant and responding party reached an agreement.
The Board ordered the matter deemed terminated within three months unless the applicant advises otherwise, and cancelled the scheduled hearing date.
Board directs representation votes for service and nursing units at a long-term care facility.
The applicants, various unions including the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, the Ontario Nurses' Association, and the Office and Professional Employees International Union, sought representation rights for employees at the Dryden Long Term Care Facility.
Pursuant to an agreement of the parties and subsection 69(8) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that representation votes be taken for a Service Unit and a Nursing Unit.
The Board established the voting constituencies, the date of the votes, and the choices to be presented on the ballots for each unit.
Certification granted to the applicant union following a successful representation vote.
The Universal Workers Union, L.I.U.N.A. Local 183 withdrew its application in Board File No. 3688-99-R by leave of the Board.
In Board File No. 2072-00-R, following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the Bricklayers, Masons Independent Union of Canada Local 1, the Board found the proposed bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Employment standards appeal dismissed after the applicants failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
The applicants appealed an Order to Pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
A hearing was scheduled, but neither the applicants nor their representative appeared.
After waiting the standard 30 minutes, the Board convened the hearing and dismissed the application.
The Board ordered the monies held in trust to be paid out to the claimant.
Order to pay termination pay affirmed; employer failed to prove wilful misconduct and sale of business provisions applied.
The applicant employer sought review of an Order to Pay eight weeks' termination pay to a former bartender.
The employer argued that the employee was terminated for wilful misconduct (over serving customers and poor attitude) and that the sale of business provisions did not apply due to a two-day break in service before the applicant purchased the tavern.
The Board found that the employer failed to prove wilful misconduct, as no clear warnings were given and the conduct was not intentional or reckless.
Furthermore, the Board held that the sale of business provisions under section 13(2) of the Employment Standards Act applied despite the brief break in service, deeming the employee's employment continuous.
The Order to Pay was affirmed.
Board deferred applicant's request to add a responding party to the scheduled hearing.
The applicant requested leave to amend its application to add an additional responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to provide proper notice to the proposed additional party and to provide the Board with a current address.
The Board deferred submissions on the request to the outset of the scheduled hearing.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Proceedings terminated and applications withdrawn following Minutes of Settlement.
The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement dated November 1, 2000.
Having regard to the settlement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the proceedings in several files and granted leave to withdraw the applications in the remaining files.
Board corrects clerical error in previous decision pursuant to s. 114(1) of the Labour Relations Act.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision to correct a clerical error in its previous decision dated October 30, 2000.
Pursuant to section 114(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board amended paragraph 3 of the decision to replace 'Local 268' with 'Local 478'.
Layoff became indefinite when employer indicated recall date was 'unknown' on Record of Employment.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay termination pay to a former employee.
The employer argued the employee was temporarily laid off and failed to return upon recall.
The Board found that because the employer indicated the recall date was 'unknown' on the Record of Employment, the layoff became an indefinite layoff under the Employment Standards Act.
The employee was therefore entitled to treat the layoff as a termination.