Application dismissed as majority of ballots cast in representation vote did not oppose the union.
The applicant filed an application that proceeded to a representation vote.
Following the vote, no statement of desire to make representations was filed.
Because not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the responding party union, the Board dismissed the application.
Representation vote ordered in union certification application; majority declines to seal ballot box.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees of the responding party municipality.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite forty percent membership support in the proposed unit and ordered a representation vote.
Although the responding party gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 disagreeing with the applicant's estimate of the number of employees, the majority of the Board declined to seal the ballot box, finding the proposed unit could be appropriate and the threshold appeared to be met.
One Board member dissented, stating she would have ordered the ballot box sealed pending a determination of the actual number of employees.
Representation vote directed in application for termination of bargaining rights.
The applicant employees applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty per cent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Board directs representation vote in union certification application with segregated ballots for disputed positions.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with segregated ballots for disputed positions including program administrators, students, administrative assistants, and office administrators.
Board directs exchange of pleadings and denies request for non-existent Labour Relations Officer report.
The Board issued procedural directions in two combined applications.
The Board directed all parties to deliver copies of their pleadings to the other parties and extended the deadline for submissions on a motion to dismiss without a hearing.
The applicant's request for a Labour Relations Officer's report and flight information was denied as no such report exists and the flight information was irrelevant.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the request of the applicants.
The applicants requested to withdraw their application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Representation vote directed in union certification application with segregated ballots for disputed positions.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of Massey Wholesale Inc. in Northeastern Ontario.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board directed a representation vote to be held on February 28, 2000.
Due to a dispute over the inclusion of employees in Timmins, Sault Ste.
Marie, and Sturgeon Falls, the Board ordered that ballots cast by individuals in those disputed positions be segregated and not counted until further order or agreement.
Representation vote directed in application for union certification.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.
Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were union members, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.
Employer's appeal of Employment Standards Officer's Order dismissed due to failure to appear.
The employer appealed an Order of an Employment Standards Officer.
The Board had previously directed the release of monies held in trust to the employee because the employer's grounds for appeal could not possibly succeed, but a hearing was still required.
The employer failed to appear at the scheduled hearing, and the Board dismissed the appeal.
Application withdrawn with leave; trust monies ordered disbursed to the responding party.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application regarding an Order to Pay.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and ordered the Director to disburse the monies held in trust to the responding party, with the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Board declares union no longer represents employees following a successful decertification vote.
The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board declared that the responding party no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.
Leave to withdraw application granted following a Memorandum of Agreement between the parties.
The applicant sought leave to withdraw her application against the responding party union.
Having regard to the Memorandum of Agreement reached between the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board at the request of the applicants.
The applicants requested to withdraw their applications against the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE Local 468).
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the applications were withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Hearings adjourned and rescheduled on consent of the parties.
The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearings.
Having regard to the agreement reached between the parties, the Board adjourned the hearings scheduled for February 8 and April 4, 2000, and rescheduled the matter for June 23 and 26, 2000.
Board consolidates two duty of fair representation applications and sets timeline for submissions on prima facie dismissal.
Two applications were filed under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act alleging violations of the union's duty of fair representation under section 74, both relating to the employer's warehouse operations in Sudbury.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consolidated the applications to avoid potentially inconsistent results.
The Board also set a timeline for the applicants to file a reply to the responding parties' request that the applications be dismissed without a hearing for failing to disclose a prima facie breach of the Act.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application against the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Employer's appeal of an Order to Pay dismissed after failing to attend the scheduled hearing.
The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board scheduled a hearing and notified the parties.
When the hearing commenced, the applicant failed to appear.
After waiting one hour, the Board dismissed the appeal and ordered the wages held in trust to be paid to the responding party employee.
Application for certification withdrawn on consent with a one-year bar and $40,000 costs payable to the union.
The union filed an application for certification.
The parties subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement to resolve a status dispute regarding a number of employees.
Pursuant to the settlement, the Board granted the union leave to withdraw the application, imposed a one-year certification bar against the union, and ordered the employer to pay $40,000 to the union for costs incurred in advancing the application.
The Board ordered the disbursement of funds held in trust pursuant to the parties' settlement.
The applicant employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Board ordered the Director in trust to disburse the funds held in trust according to the settlement, with $3,264.00 paid to the employee, $1,203.84 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union and defined the appropriate bargaining unit.