Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application against the respondents.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3902, sought to withdraw multiple applications against the responding party, University of Toronto.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.
Style of cause amended to reflect the correct name of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision correcting an error in paragraph 1 of its previous decision dated February 25, 2000.
The style of cause was amended to reflect the correct name of the responding party as 'Highrise Window Technologies Inc.'.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Board orders disbursement of funds held in trust in accordance with parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Board ordered the disbursement of the funds held in trust by the Director in accordance with the settlement, with $600 to be paid to the employee and the remainder returned to the employer or retained as an administration fee.
Duty of fair representation application dismissed for failing to allege any union misconduct.
The applicant filed an application alleging a breach of section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding trade union requested the application be dismissed for failing to disclose a prima facie case.
The Board found that the applicant's submissions related solely to the conduct of an individual and made no allegations of union misconduct.
As section 74 only concerns the conduct of trade unions, the application was dismissed without prejudice.
Reconsideration denied; 10% administration fee on ESA Order to Pay is discretionary, not mandatory.
The Ministry of Labour requested reconsideration of a Board decision that ordered the return of a 10% administration fee to the employer.
The Ministry argued the fee was a mandatory amount on the gross Order to Pay.
The Board dismissed the request, finding that under sections 65(1.2) and 68(6) of the Employment Standards Act, the imposition of administration costs is discretionary.
The Board affirmed its exercise of discretion to rescind the fee, noting the Order to Pay was improperly made due to the Ministry's failure to provide timely notice of the complainants' names.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.
Representation vote directed in union certification application.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board directed a representation vote to be held, with any disputes regarding the inclusion of certain employees or the employer's legal identity to be determined following the vote.
Request for reconsideration of duty of fair representation complaint dismissed.
The applicant requested reconsideration of a Board decision dismissing his duty of fair representation complaint against the union.
The complaint arose from the union's decision to settle two grievances related to the applicant's accommodation and administrative transfer.
The Board found that the union had considered relevant factors, including legal advice, the likelihood of success, and the impact on the bargaining unit, in deciding to settle.
The Board concluded that the applicant raised no new evidence or arguments that could not have been raised previously, and dismissed the request for reconsideration.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed due to lack of evidence and untimeliness.
The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against his union, alleging it violated section 74 of the Labour Relations Act by negotiating a memorandum of agreement that allowed other employees to rewrite a certification exam, and by failing to require the employer to post a Chief Operator position permanently.
The Board dismissed the application, finding no evidence of a conspiracy between the union and the employer, noting the complaint regarding the memorandum was untimely, and observing that the applicant had failed to file a grievance or seek the union's advice when he first perceived he was being wronged.
Application to terminate bargaining rights dismissed after union retains majority support in representation vote.
The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the union.
As a result, the application was dismissed.
Union certified as bargaining agent for warehouse employees following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent warehouse employees of the responding party.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board following filing of Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application against the responding party.
Having regard to the Minutes of Settlement filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.
Following a representation vote in which more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.
The applicant requested to withdraw the application.
Union certified as bargaining agent following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party at a specific location in Windsor.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Union application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application.