Who is Alison Renton?

Alison Renton is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 589 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Alison Renton sit on?

Alison Renton sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Alison Renton decide?

Alison Renton's most common areas include Human Rights (589 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (203 decisions), Administrative Law (177 decisions). Alison Renton has handled 589 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Alison Renton made?

Alison Renton has 589 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Alison Renton?

Representatives who frequently appear before Alison Renton include Self-represented, Wade Poziomka, Brenda Bowlby.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Alison Renton — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Civil Litigation - Defendant

Real Estate Law

Alison Renton

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

589

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 437Vice-chair· 77Adjudicator· 51Adjudicator· 14Vice-Chair· 4Vice-Chair· 3Vice-chair· 1

Grace Vaccerelli

1 case2009–2009

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 2, 2009

Tribunal resolves multiple procedural and production motions in consolidated cross-applications for workplace sexual harassment.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision addressing multiple procedural issues in two consolidated human rights applications involving cross-allegations of sexual harassment between two former employees.

The Tribunal ruled on the admissibility of late-filed documents, methods of document delivery, production of electronic emails, amendments to pleadings to add grounds and increase claimed damages, the order of proceedings, and requests to sever the applications.

The Tribunal permitted the amendments, ordered searches for the electronic email, set the order of testimony, and affirmed that the applications would continue to be heard together.

Frolov v. Mosregion Investment Corporation, 2009 HRTO 384

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2009

Hearing scheduled to address preliminary objections to discrimination claim regarding Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines discriminate on the basis of age and sex.

In its response, the respondent requested early dismissal of the application, arguing that it is not the proper party, the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction, and the substance of the application was already dealt with in the applicant's divorce proceeding.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision scheduling a hearing to address the respondent's preliminary objections, noting that under s. 43(2) of the Human Rights Code, it cannot finally dispose of an application without affording the parties an opportunity to make oral submissions.

Gary Rochester v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2009 HRTO 270

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 9, 2009

Human rights application deferred on consent pending completion of concurrent Police Services Act proceeding.

The applicant filed an application alleging harassment and discrimination in employment on the basis of ancestry, creed, and reprisal.

The applicant requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the completion of an outstanding proceeding under the Police Services Act involving the same facts.

As no parties objected, the Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application to prevent concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions.

David Oliver v. South Simcoe Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 260

Stephen Bernofsky

In Private Practice18 cases1984–2021

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2009

Respondents granted 10-day extension to file Response to contravention of settlement application.

The applicant filed an Application alleging Contravention of Settlement.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 14 days after the applicant delivered the Application by e-mail to their apparent lawyer.

The Tribunal issued an Interim Decision directing that the Application and Decision be sent to the respondents by mail and courier, and granted the respondents 10 days to file a Response and explain the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Monique Campbell v. Metaca Corporation and Leona Byrne, 2009 HRTO 255

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2009

Respondents granted 10 days to file a late Response to an Application alleging Contravention of Settlement.

The applicant filed an Application alleging Contravention of Settlement.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 14 days.

The Tribunal issued an Interim Decision noting the failure to respond and granting the respondents 10 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Agnieszka Kedron v. Agat Laboratories Ltd. and Marcus Maguire, 2009 HRTO 256

Jean Iu

8 cases2009–2026

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2009

Tribunal awards $15,000 for disability-based workplace harassment that forced an employee to resign.

The complainant, a bartender with an anxiety disorder, alleged that her manager harassed and discriminated against her on the basis of her disability, ultimately forcing her to resign.

The respondents did not participate in the written hearing.

The Tribunal found that the manager's public comments about her mental health, fabrication of reasons for her absences, and reduction of her shifts constituted discrimination and harassment under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal awarded $15,000 in general damages but denied the claim for special damages due to insufficient medical evidence linking her ongoing inability to work to the discrimination.

The corporate respondent was also ordered to post a notice regarding human rights in the workplace.

Turner v. 507638 Ontario Limited, 2009 HRTO 249

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as narrative did not allege Code-protected discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of 'record of offences' following his dismissal after a medical leave of absence.

The Tribunal previously directed the applicant to provide written submissions explaining whether he had a 'record of offences' within the meaning of the Code, but no submissions were received.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's narrative did not allege discrimination on the basis of a record of offences or disability, and therefore dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Mark Reid v. Torbram Electric Supply Corporation, 2009 HRTO 195

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as record of offences only applies to employment.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in goods, services, and facilities on the basis of record of offences, challenging a court order that prohibited him from representing himself as an engineer without being licensed by the respondent.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, noting that under the Human Rights Code, discrimination based on record of offences applies only to employment.

Furthermore, the applicant did not allege discrimination in employment nor did he meet the statutory definition of having a record of offences.

Jan Rajca v. Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, 2009 HRTO 199

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 4, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn on consent of the parties.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Amy Matwijow v. Unger Nursing Home Ltd. o/a Tufford Nursing Home and Michael Walter, 2009 HRTO 128

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 3, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for delay; applicant's participation in other proceedings negated good faith explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, ancestry, and disability against his former employers and a lawyer.

The application was filed more than ten years after the alleged incidents.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant submitted that the delay was due to depression and psychiatric care.

The Tribunal found that the delay was not incurred in good faith, noting that the applicant had commenced and participated in numerous other legal proceedings during the same period.

The application was dismissed for being outside the one-year time limit under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Santiago Quimado v. S.A. Armstrong Ltd. and John Field, 2009 HRTO 110

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Leave to withdraw human rights application granted.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Lisa Belair v. 2030413 Ontario Limited o/a Brantford Home Hardware, 2009 HRTO 117

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Long v. Finding the Way Learning Centre, 2009 HRTO 116

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with consent of the respondents and leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw the human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents consented to the withdrawal.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

A corrigendum was subsequently issued to correct a typographical error in the file number on the cover page.

Ferguson v. CJM Property Management, 2009 HRTO 115

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent made no submissions.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Giglione v. Law Cranberry Resort Ltd., 2009 HRTO 114

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Application withdrawn with consent of the respondent and leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent consented to the withdrawal.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Terrance Allcock v. Poraver North America, 2009 HRTO 113

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Solomon v. Brantford (City), 2009 HRTO 118

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application against the Corporation of the City of Elliot Lake pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Harris v. Elliot Lake (City), 2009 HRTO 119

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Elizabeth Carlos v. St. Clair O’Connor Community Inc., 2009 HRTO 120

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2009

Request to expedite denied; applicant ordered to provide submissions on Tribunal's jurisdiction over prior complaint.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and requested that the proceedings be expedited.

The respondent opposed the request and challenged the Tribunal's jurisdiction under s. 53(8) of the Human Rights Code, arguing the applicant had previously filed a complaint with the Commission based on the same facts.

The Tribunal denied the request to expedite, finding no urgent circumstances that would affect the fair and just resolution of the application.

The Tribunal deferred the jurisdictional issue and ordered the applicant to file submissions explaining why the application is not barred by s. 53(8).

Zavarella v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2009 HRTO 80

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2009

Tribunal issues final deadline for respondent to file Response before proceeding without their participation.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent that failure to file a Response by a specified final deadline could result in the Tribunal proceeding without their participation and deeming them to have accepted the allegations.

Gary Rochester v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by Ministry of the Attorney General, 2009 HRTO 82

Page 29 of 30 (589 cases)

Applicant

Alexandre BystrovSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry BezaireSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ben WeiglSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward YeboahSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ellaine RichardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary GrzywoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jamal HamedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kira VallenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lubov VolnyanskySelf-represented
1 appearance
Oussama YaldokaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen BullSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Anna VereschaginCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo PolicelliCounsel
1 appearance
Michael GauthierCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance
Robert W. AugerCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Jack BraithwaiteCounsel
1 appearance

for Ajax Automobile (2008) Inc. o/a Ajax Nissan

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for Ajax Automotive (2008) Inc. o/a Ajax Nissan

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for College of Physicians and Surgeons and Gail Buss

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for Comcare Health Services and Shelley Dietz

Margaret SzilassyCounsel
2 appearances

for Dina Stolyarova

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances
Grace VaccerelliCounsel
1 appearance

for E&E Seegmiller Limited and Les Coulas

Jordan SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for Forestwood Co-operative Homes Inc.

Paula BoutisCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

David FrolovSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris FerringoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and Mosregion Investments Corp.

Igor BakouchevSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Housing Connections

Gordon SteinbergAgent
1 appearance

for Human Rights Watch and Kimberley Hui

Nancy HammAgent
1 appearance

for Huron Shores Gymnastics and Trampoline Club and John Craig

John CraigSelf-represented
1 appearance

for IDP Group Inc.

Mike DagenaisAgent
1 appearance

for Igor Bakouchev and Mosregion Investments Corp.

Igor BakouchevSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Janet Menard

Sarah KimAgent
1 appearance
John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for JM Tek Ltd. and Janusz Maciag

Gerard ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Rittenberg

Lisa ConstantineCounsel
1 appearance

for K.H.

Allison ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for LaFarge Canada Inc.

Tom MoutsatsosCounsel
1 appearance

for Lakeridge Health

Jessica KearseyCounsel
1 appearance

for Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Cheri DiNovo, Carly Jones and Susan Rogers

Carly JonesAgent
1 appearance

for Marcin Bachleda

Marcin BachledaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Matthew Dawiczewski

Brian DoodyAgent
1 appearance

for Michael Hatton

Michael HattonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Michael Sullivan

Rachel TurnpenneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Midway Nissan

Hermie AbrahamCounsel
2 appearances

for Miller Thompson LLP

Erik MarshallCounsel
1 appearance
Eric MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

for North York General Hospital, Esther Koven, and Ashton White

Hal RolphCounsel
1 appearance

for Saint Elizabeth Health Care, Shirlee Sharkey, Cheryl Johnson, Trish P. Maxwell and Neilia Cabral

Margaret TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for Saint Elizabeth Health Care, Shirlee Sharkey, Cheryl Johnson, Trish P. Maxwell, Neilia Cabral

Margaret TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Limited and Darren Blewitt

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected party

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Public Service Alliance of CanadaUnion representative
1 appearance
Human Rights Legal Support CentreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
5 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
5 appearances
Janina FogelsCounsel
4 appearances
Lubov VolnyanskySelf-represented
4 appearances
Bill KoitsisSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mahdi TarabainSelf-represented
3 appearances
Delphine St. JacquesAgent
3 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
3 appearances
Tony SangiulianoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Weihua ShiSelf-represented
3 appearances
William FlorenceCounsel
2 appearances
Kathleen DeBlock BoersmaCounsel
2 appearances
Laura LunanskyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
2 appearances
S.M.Self-represented
2 appearances
Heather HumphriesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Daniel KahramanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Chantel TieCounsel
2 appearances
Karen FranceschinaSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Mindy NobleCounsel
3 appearances
T.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Auto Workers, Local 524

Les VilneffUnion representative
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance
Jean C. H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Guy SeguinAgent
1 appearance

for the corporate respondent and remaining personal respondents

Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance

for the corporate respondent and the personal respondents Zoltan Dobinai and Christina Dobsinai

Michael LernerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
2 appearances
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Evan SchillerCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Paul LaCourseUnion representative
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance
Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmakhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Canadian Auto Workers Unions, Local 1285

Leon RideoutUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Chrysler Canada Inc.

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the personal respondent

Stephen BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Shawna KadykaloCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Brenda BowlbyCounsel
5 appearances
Michelle AltonCounsel
4 appearances
Caroline CohenCounsel
3 appearances
Ann DinnertCounsel
2 appearances
Elizabeth ForsterCounsel
2 appearances
Sarah CrossleyCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer BirrellCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Lauri ReesorCounsel
2 appearances
Jeremy HannCounsel
2 appearances
Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
2 appearances
Ted KovacsCounsel
2 appearances
Nancy SalernoCounsel
2 appearances
Vera SimpsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Reddy ChavaliAgent
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
Jim KaytorAgent
2 appearances
Robert W. WeirCounsel
2 appearances
Devon RyerseCounsel
1 appearance
Duane ReaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1145678 Ontario Limited

Christopher HerrmannAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Abitibi Consolidated Company Of Canada

Peter ThorupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ajax Automobile (2008) Inc. o/a Ajax Nissan

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Intervenor

Angela RaeCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Avon Maitland District School Board

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Chief of Police, Toronto Police Service

Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, City of Toronto

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domenic Commisso

Domenic CommissoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada, Limited

Margaret SzilassyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle AltonCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Holcim (Canada) Inc.

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Housing Connections

Gordon SteinbergAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Midway Nissan (Whitby/Oshawa) Ltd.

Hermie AbrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers’ Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) Local 1520

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Carla GoncalvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peel Regional Police Association

Gary HopkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Quinte Healthcare Corporation

Maureen HoustonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
4 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
3 appearances
H.P. RolphCounsel
2 appearances
Donna PetriCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn GoodmanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kristen TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Lia PreydeCounsel
1 appearance
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Matt DewarCounsel
1 appearance
Matthew DemeoCounsel
1 appearance
Meighan Ferris-MilesCounsel
1 appearance
Michelle DobranowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Mr. GourleyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CahillCounsel
1 appearance
Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
R. Gordon HillsCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (except Asha Rathod)

Brenda BowlbyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents FCA Canada Inc. and Rob Gardiner

Clifford HartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services on behalf of the Ontario Provincial Police, Janice Mulcock and Rob Hagerman

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Simona Dinu

Simona DinuSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents Lynn Bradley and Ronald Laliberté

Sara BlakeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Sibley and Associates and Mary Virio

Mark KlaimanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart MacDonald

Stuart MacDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Police Services Board

Lauri ReesorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Service

Susan HirotaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Howard LawUnion representative
1 appearance

for Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada and Chris Dahmer

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers, Local 9597, Affected Party

Sherry CharetteUnion representative
1 appearance

for UNITE HERE Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for Wee Watch Day Care Systems

Gordon BentCounsel
1 appearance

for Women’s College Hospital Family Practice Health Centre

Janet MurdochCounsel
1 appearance

for Women’s College Hospital, Family Practice Health Centre

Janet ZiveCounsel
1 appearance

for York University, Lillie Lum, and Douglas Peers

Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for York University, Lillie Lum, Douglas Peers

Leanne De FilippisCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for the Applicant

L.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Judith ZarubiakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margarita AriasSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his behalf and on behalf of the Corporate Respondent

Igor BakouchevSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

David FrolovSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilles GagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael LachanceSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Mourad BelamineSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sam BattagliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Claudio Ruiz-PilarteAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Ann DinnertCounsel
1 appearance

589

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.5

cases/mo

HRTO589(100%)

Decision types

motion

550

trial

Page 29 of 30 (589 cases)