Board upholds one work assignment to Millwrights but finds second assignment violated conveyor agreement.
The applicant Ironworkers filed two jurisdictional dispute complaints regarding work assigned by the employer to the Millwrights.
The first complaint involved repair and maintenance of slat conveyors at a Toyota plant, which the Board upheld as correctly assigned to the Millwrights based on area practice and the International Agreement.
The second complaint involved the installation of an overhead mono-rail conveyor at a Budd plant.
The Board found the employer incorrectly assigned all phase 2 work to the Millwrights, holding that the work should have been assigned in accordance with the conveyor agreement, which would have allocated a portion of the work to the Ironworkers.
Consent request to extend filing dates granted.
The applicant requested an extension of time to file materials on consent of the responding party.
The Board granted the request, extending the applicant's filing date to December 21, 2001, and the responding party's filing date to January 7, 2002.
Employer ordered to pay $44,730 in damages for unpaid wages and benefits in default judgment.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit contributions and pay proper wages.
The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.
Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
The Board found the employer violated the Collective Agreement, ordered compliance, and awarded $44,730.00 in damages plus $214.00 in costs.
Grievance referral granted by default; employer ordered to pay damages for collective agreement violations.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party employer failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.
Applying its Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the employer to have accepted the facts in the application.
The Board declared the employer bound by the collective agreement, found it had violated the agreement, and ordered it to pay $6,086.54 in damages and $214.00 in statutory costs.
Board consolidated grievance referral and related employer applications and granted extension to file responses.
The applicant union filed a referral of grievance and a related employer/sale of business application against the responding parties.
The applicant requested that the matters be consolidated and waived the time limits for the grievance referral.
The responding party requested an extension of time to file responses.
The Board ordered that the matters be processed together for all purposes and granted the responding party an extension of time to file replies.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Grievance application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union filed a grievance against the responding party employer.
On consent of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, to be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made within that time.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
The applicant, Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 493, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 2486 and Interpaving Limited.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Discharge for safety policy violation excessive for 37-year employee; five-day suspension substituted.
The union grieved the termination of an employee with 37 years of seniority who was discharged for failing to wear a fall arrest harness on a construction site, contrary to the employer's safety policy.
The union conceded the breach but argued the penalty was excessive.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that while a severe disciplinary response was warranted given the employee's prior safety warnings and careless attitude toward the policy, discharge was excessive in light of his lengthy seniority.
The Board substituted a five-day suspension for the discharge.
Grievance referral adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the grievance referral sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
Adjournment of certification hearing denied absent consent of all parties.
The applicant union in one of two related certification applications requested that the matters be heard together and that an upcoming hearing date be adjourned due to counsel's unavailability.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board denied the request, stating it would not delay the hearing of a certification application absent the consent and agreement of all parties.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
Hearing adjourned due to a serious family health matter affecting the responding party's witnesses.
The responding party, Artisan Masonry Inc., requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates due to a serious family health matter requiring the attendance of its advisors and witnesses in Windsor.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the adjournment request and referred the matter to the Registrar for rescheduling.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.
Board issued consent order declaring employer bound by collective agreement and awarding $6,000 in damages.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.
The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party is bound by the collective agreement, violated articles 4 and 5, and directed the responding party to pay $6,000 in damages to the applicant.
Board issues consent orders reflecting partial settlement of construction grievance regarding banked hours and non-union work.
The union filed a construction grievance against the employer under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The parties reached Partial Minutes of Settlement in which the employer admitted to violating the collective agreement by banking hours and subcontracting bargaining unit work to a non-union member.
The Board issued consent declarations and orders reflecting the settlement, including a cease and desist order regarding banking hours, and adjourned the matter sine die for up to one year to allow the parties to quantify damages.
Application withdrawn following settlement between the parties.
The applicant requested to revive the application but subsequently advised the Board that the matter had been settled.
The Board accordingly ordered the application withdrawn.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed.