The United States requested the extradition of Colin Levy for alleged involvement in MDMA distribution and cocaine importation.
The Attorney General of Canada sought a committal order under the Extradition Act.
Levy's counsel argued insufficient identification evidence, particularly concerning single photo identification.
The court found that the identification evidence, including witness testimony from someone who knew Levy and surveillance by a special agent, was not manifestly unreliable.
The court distinguished previous case law on single photo identification, noting that it is not inherently unreliable if the witness had prior knowledge of the subject, reinforcing *United States of America v. Khuc* and *R. v. Liebhardt*.
The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient to justify an order for committal for extradition.