The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law amendment application to permit a 26-storey rental apartment building.
Prior to the merit hearing, the parties reached a settlement for a revised 22-storey building.
Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and the City's Official Plan, and representative of good planning.
The appeal was allowed in part, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of several conditions.