The appellant appealed a jury verdict finding the respondent not negligent in a snowmobile accident.
The appellant argued the trial judge erred in interpreting s. 10 of Regulation 804 under the Motorized Snow Vehicles Act and in admitting marijuana-related evidence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, agreeing that the appellant was 'on a highway' whether on the paved portion or the shoulder.
The court found the jury was properly instructed on the respondent's potential negligence.
Because the jury found the respondent not negligent, the admissibility of the marijuana evidence relevant to the appellant's contributory negligence was moot.
