The plaintiff brought a motion seeking to set aside a previous order that dismissed most of her extensive claim against numerous defendants, alleging fraud or newly discovered facts.
She also sought to lift a stay of action, strike statements of defence, obtain summary judgment, and allow for intervention.
The court dismissed the motion, finding no evidence of fraud related to the prior order and no newly discovered facts that would have altered the outcome.
The court emphasized the stringent test for setting aside orders, particularly those made under Rule 2.1, and deemed the other requested relief moot.
