2 total
Litigation privilege over national security proffer waived vis-à-vis trial judge to ensure trial efficiency.
The plaintiffs brought a motion seeking a declaration that the defendant waived litigation privilege over a 'Proffer' document provided to the Attorney General of Canada for national security vetting under s. 38 of the Canada Evidence Act.
The court held that while the document was created for the dominant purpose of litigation, the defendant's stated intention of using it to promote trial efficiency constituted a waiver of privilege vis-à-vis the trial judge.
The court ordered the unredacted Proffer to be provided to the judge and established a comprehensive trial protocol, including the appointment of amicus curiae and advance vetting of sensitive evidence, to balance national security concerns with trial fairness.
Binding oral profit-sharing agreement for COVID-19 PPE procurement enforced; plaintiff awarded $10.2 million.
The plaintiffs sued for breach of an oral profit-sharing agreement related to a federal government contract to supply surgical gowns during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The court found that the parties had formed a binding oral contract to collaborate and share net profits on an 80.6/19.4 split, despite the lack of a signed written agreement and the defendant's claim that board approval was required.
The court awarded the plaintiff $10,229,782 in damages, representing 19.4% of the net profits from the gowns contract.
