The appellant appealed a motion judge's decision dismissing his action as frivolous and vexatious under Rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The action named numerous defendants including government entities, corporations, and political parties, alleging perceived personal wrongs.
The motion judge found the statement of claim contained nonsensical allegations that disclosed no cause of action against any defendant.
The Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal, finding both the underlying action and the notice of appeal to be frivolous and vexatious, as the appeal grounds merely reiterated the same problematic allegations from the statement of claim without demonstrating any merit.
