Ontario Review Board

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for assault.

The accused's attending psychiatrist testified that the accused had stabilized, secured full-time employment, and moved into supportive housing, recommending a conditional discharge.

The Crown opposed the conditional discharge due to partial insight and risk factors.

The Board found that the accused had made commendable progress over the past year and granted a conditional discharge with conditions, including a specified address to consolidate recent gains.

The accused was found not criminally responsible for multiple sexual assaults and other offences.

At the initial Ontario Review Board disposition hearing, all parties agreed the accused remained a significant threat to public safety.

The hospital and Crown recommended a Detention Order to the Forensic Service, while the accused sought placement in a General Forensic Unit.

Relying on the attending psychiatrist's evidence that the accused's symptoms were well controlled and his risk could be managed, the Board ordered detention in a General Forensic Unit with privileges up to community living.

The hospital requested an early review of the accused's conditional discharge disposition due to her escalating violent and harassing behaviour towards her boyfriend.

The accused, who had previously been found not criminally responsible for arson, was diagnosed with schizophrenia and personality traits.

The hospital sought a Detention Order and a No Contact clause to manage the risk and engage her in treatment, as she repeatedly left voluntary hospital admissions against medical advice.

The Ontario Review Board found that the accused continued to pose a significant threat to public safety and that a Detention Order with a No Contact clause was necessary and appropriate to protect the public and facilitate her treatment.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review two Restrictions of Liberty (ROL) imposed on the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose.

The hospital restricted the accused's liberties after his mental status significantly deteriorated following a fall, leading to disorganization, paranoia, and aggressive behavior.

The Board found that both the March and April ROLs were warranted, necessary, and represented the least onerous and least restrictive measures to stabilize the accused's mental health.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for mischief and arson.

The accused, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, had recently pled guilty to sexual assault and received a conditional sentence requiring him to remain in hospital.

The parties jointly submitted that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety.

The Board accepted the joint submission, finding that the accused's severe intractable mental disorder, residual symptoms, and risk of impulsive violence necessitated a continuation of the detention order on the same terms.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for robbery and other offences.

The Board found that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety due to mood instability, substance use, and risk of violence if unsupervised.

The Board ordered a continuation of the detention order, with a modification to allow the hospital to approve housing in the community that is not necessarily supervised.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for assault and uttering threats.

The parties agreed that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety due to his schizoaffective disorder, history of medication non-adherence, and risk of substance use.

The Board found that the accused required ongoing medication supervision and hospital-approved accommodation to remain stable.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition pursuant to s. 672.81(1) of the Criminal Code.

The accused had previously been found not criminally responsible for uttering threats and assaulting a peace officer.

Based on a joint submission and psychiatric evidence indicating ongoing symptoms of schizophrenia and intellectual disability, the Board found that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order on the same terms.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition pursuant to section 672.81(1) of the Criminal Code.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for firearms and uttering threats offences and was diagnosed with schizophrenia.

The Board found that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety due to his lack of insight, ongoing paranoia, and risk of medication non-compliance if discharged.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order on the same terms to support his gradual transition to community living.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for assault and uttering threats.

The accused had been living in the community successfully and remained stable on medication for bipolar disorder.

All parties agreed that while the accused remained a significant threat to public safety, a detention order was no longer necessary.

The Board ordered a conditional discharge, adopting the hospital's recommended conditions but declining to impose a substance use prohibition as there was no history of substance use disorder.

The accused was found not criminally responsible for exposure for a sexual purpose and indecent acts.

At the initial disposition hearing, the Ontario Review Board considered psychiatric evidence indicating the accused suffers from schizoaffective disorder.

The Board accepted the joint submission of the parties that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety.

A Detention Order was issued with conditions including a weapons prohibition and a no-contact order regarding the victims.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual hearing to review the conditional discharge of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for mischief and arson.

The accused has schizophrenia and a substance use disorder, both currently in remission.

The treatment team and all parties recommended continuing the conditional discharge but removing the condition requiring abstention from intoxicants, as the accused had been abstinent for five years and compliant with treatment.

The Board found the accused still posed a significant threat to public safety but agreed that the proposed disposition was the least onerous and least restrictive option.

The conditional discharge was continued with the abstention condition removed.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for attempted murder.

The accused suffers from a complex personality disorder and has a history of substance use.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public due to poor insight, risk of substance-induced psychosis, and ongoing need for monitoring.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current detention order without change to its terms.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for assault and criminal harassment, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual hearing.

The hospital and Crown submitted that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety, which the Board accepted.

The hospital requested a transfer to the Royal Ottawa Hospital to allow the accused to be closer to her oncologist for breast cancer treatment.

The Board approved the transfer, maintaining the current disposition conditions.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault, underwent an annual Review Board hearing.

The hospital had transferred the accused to a secure forensic unit due to a deterioration in mental state and lack of engagement with treatment.

The Board found the transfer was a restriction of liberty but was warranted and the least restrictive option.

The Board concluded the accused remains a significant threat to public safety and ordered continued detention at the hospital in a secure forensic unit, with discretion for the hospital to transfer the accused to a general unit if appropriate.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to determine whether the accused, who had previously been found unfit to stand trial on assault charges, remained unfit.

Based on the uncontradicted evidence of his treating psychiatrist, the Board found that the accused's mental health had significantly improved and he was now fit to stand trial.

The Board directed his return to court and declined to make an order under section 672.49 of the Criminal Code to detain him in the hospital pending his return, finding no reasonable grounds to believe he would become unfit in a correctional facility.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for arson-related offences.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and a neurocognitive disorder, remained stable in a hospital setting but continued to experience symptoms and lacked insight.

The treatment team opined that she required a 24/7 supervised setting, such as a long-term care facility, but none was currently available.

The Board found that the accused continued to represent a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of her detention disposition without change, while noting concerns about bureaucratic delays in securing a long-term care placement.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for attempted murder.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder, had been residing in the community under a detention order.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his fragile mental health and limited insight.

However, accepting the joint submission of the parties, the Board concluded that a conditional discharge was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition necessary, as the provisions of the Mental Health Act would be sufficient to manage his risk in the community.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for arson and other offences.

The accused had been living in the community without readmission since 2021, demonstrating good insight into his schizoaffective disorder and substance use issues.

All parties, including the hospital and the Attorney General, jointly submitted that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to public safety.

The Board agreed and ordered an absolute discharge.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to determine the fitness and disposition of the accused, who was previously found unfit to stand trial on charges including break and enter and theft.

Based on the uncontradicted psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the accused remained unfit to stand trial due to a severe thought disorder stemming from schizophrenia.

The Board ordered a detention order as the necessary and appropriate disposition, noting the accused's history of homelessness and non-compliance with treatment, but declined to impose a condition prohibiting the use of intoxicating substances due to a lack of evidence of substance abuse.