OLRB 2000

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the City of Toronto and the Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant.

A certificate was ordered to issue for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union and defined the appropriate bargaining unit.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the matter was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board determined that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite forty per cent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held among the eligible employees.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at the responding party's facility.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The Ontario Nurses' Association (ONA) filed submissions seeking a clarity note in a proposed paramedical bargaining unit description to specify that Case Managers or Professional Practice Leaders who are Registered or Graduate Nurses fall within the ONA bargaining unit.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the parties to file any responses to ONA's submissions by a specified date, after which the Board would consider issuing a final decision, directing further submissions, or referring the issues to a consultation.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding parties failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding parties were deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found that the responding parties were bound by the collective agreement and violated it by failing to utilize union members for work at a Barrie condominium project.

The Board ordered the responding parties to pay $55,323.84 in damages and $214.00 for the applicant's filing fees.

The applicant requested an amendment to the certificate to correct the responding party's name.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and ordered that the certificate be amended by inserting the word 'Ontario' after '1278655'.

The applicant referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Having regard to the Minutes of Settlement filed by the parties, the Board granted leave to withdraw the referral.

The applicants requested to withdraw their referral of a grievance to the Board.

The Board granted the request and the referral was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision to correct a typographical error in paragraph 5 of its previous decision dated June 29, 2000.

The reference to Board File No. 0078-00-G was revised to read Board File No. 0798-00-G.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the responding party's employees.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed within the required time.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The applicant brought a matter before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board adjourned the matter to October 20, 2000.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor trade union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the declaration.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at the responding party's workplace.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union.

A certificate was ordered to issue to the applicant.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union sought leave to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant filed an application for a declaration terminating bargaining rights.

The responding union asserted the application was untimely due to recent amendments to the Labour Relations Act, 1995 concerning the residential construction sector.

The Board directed the applicant to file submissions regarding the timeliness of the application.