The applicant sought a review of a single Member's decision awarding $3,000 in additional compensation for pain and suffering related to a 1975 assault.
The applicant argued that all his current health issues, including a knee replacement, were caused by the original assault and sought further compensation.
The two-member panel found no error of law or unreasonable exercise of discretion in the single Member's decision, noting the applicant failed to provide sufficient medical evidence linking all his current health problems to the 1975 incident.
The review was denied and the $3,000 award was upheld.